Distal Femoral Bone Loss

OrthoMedia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Bryeson Rodgers ◽  
Gabrielle Wernick ◽  
Gabrielle Roman ◽  
Christopher P. Beauchamp ◽  
Mark J. Spangehl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Mancino ◽  
Vincenzo Di Matteo ◽  
Fabrizio Mocini ◽  
Giorgio Cacciola ◽  
Giuseppe Malerba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several studies have evaluated the survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement (PFR) in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty with severe proximal femoral bone loss; however, there remains no consensus on the overall performance of this implant. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature in order to examine survivorship and complication rates of PFR usage. Methods A systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles using various combinations of keywords. Results In all, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 578 PFR were implanted. The all-cause reoperation-free survivorship was 76.6%. The overall complication rate was 27.2%. Dislocation was the most common complication observed and the most frequent reason for reoperation with an incidence of 12.8 and 7.6%, respectively. Infection after PFR had an incidence of 7.6% and a reoperation rate of 6.4%. The reoperation rate for aseptic loosening of the implant was 5.9%. Overall, patients had improved outcomes as documented by postoperative hip scores. Conclusion PFR usage have a relatively high complication rate, however, it remains an efficacious treatment option in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone affected by severe proximal femoral bone loss. Modular designs have shown reduced dislocations rate and higher survivorship free from dislocation. However, PFR should only be used as salvage procedure when no other reconstruction options are available.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1482-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Brown ◽  
Jared R.H. Foran ◽  
Craig J. Della Valle ◽  
Mario Moric ◽  
Scott M. Sporer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Weicheng Zhang ◽  
Jun Zhou ◽  
Yaozeng Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty is frequently accompanied by bone loss. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty for massive femoral bone loss using cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems.Methods: During the period of 2007 to 2015 at a single hospital, 34 hips (33 patients) underwent primary revision surgery with cementless modular, fluted, tapered stems due to massive bone loss, and patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or tumours were excluded. The hips were revised with the LINK MP (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) prosthesis. Bone loss was categorized by the Paprosky classification for prosthesis loosening and Vancouver classification for peri-prosthetic fracture. All revision bearing surfaces were ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC). Clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes and survivorship were evaluated.Results: The mean follow-up was 9.1±2.5 years (range, 5-13 years). The Harris hip score was 43.6±11.5 preoperatively and maintained at 86.5±6.6 at the time of latest follow-up (p<0. 05). The X-ray showed bone ingrowth fixation in 30 hips (88%), fibrous stable fixation in 3 hips (9%) and instability in 1 hip (3%). The average stem subsidence was 3.9±2.2 mm (range, 1 to 10 mm). The survivorship of prostheses with re-revision for any reason was 95% (95% CI, 12.0 to 13.0) at the 10-year follow-up. Three (9%) re-revisions were needed, including 1 for aseptic loosening, 1 for dislocation and 1 for infection.Conclusions: The mid- to long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with the cementless modular, fluted, tapered stem (LINK MP stem) are encouraging for massive femoral bone loss.


2000 ◽  
Vol 82-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1151-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Radl ◽  
C. Aigner ◽  
M. Hungerford ◽  
A. Pascher ◽  
R. Windhager

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 1285-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Blain ◽  
A. Vuillemin ◽  
A. Blain ◽  
F. Guillemin ◽  
N. D. Talance ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1771-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Watanabe ◽  
Hiroshi Ohshima ◽  
Koh Mizuno ◽  
Chiharu Sekiguchi ◽  
Masao Fukunaga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document