Establishing the Content Validity of LIMB-Q Kids – A New Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Children with Lower Limb Deformities

OrthoMedia ◽  
2022 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harpreet Chhina ◽  
Anne F. Klassen ◽  
Jacek A. Kopec ◽  
John Oliffe ◽  
Christopher Iobst ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lower limb deformities include conditions such as leg length discrepancy, lower limb deficiency and associated angular and rotational deformities of the hips, knees, ankles and feet. Children with lower limb deformities often have physical limitations due to gait irregularities and pain. The differences in the appearance and function of their lower limbs can discourage participation in social, recreational and leisure activities, which may result in behavioural, emotional, psychological and social adjustment problems. The health-related quality of life (HRQL) of these children is often impacted due to the factors discussed above, as well as by the complex surgical procedures. Surgical treatment options for limb deformities in children vary from limb lengthening and reconstruction to amputation. The lack of evidence demonstrating superiority of either treatment options and their effect on HRQL limits the ability of healthcare providers to counsel families on the best evidence-based treatment option for them. This manuscript describes the international qualitative study which guided the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Individual semi-structured face-to-face interviews with children with lower limb deformities and their parents were conducted at five sites: Canada (2 sites), Ethiopia, India and the USA. Results Seventy-nine interviews were conducted at five international sites. Five main themes emerged from the qualitative interviews and formed the basis of the conceptual framework. These themes were: 1) appearance, 2) physical health, 3) psychological health 4) school and 5) social health. Conclusions Lower limb deformities have a substantial impact on the HRQL of children. The concepts of interest identified in our study were similar across children from all countries. The conceptual framework guided the development of outcome scales specific to these patients. The information about the impact of various treatment options on the HRQL of children with lower limb deformities, collected using this new PROM, could be used to inform parents and children about outcomes (physical, social, psychological) associated with specific treatment options. This information could supplement other objective outcome information (e.g., complication rates, how the leg will look, etc.) to help families to come to a more informed decision on a child’s course of treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Flythe ◽  
Adeline Dorough ◽  
Julia H. Narendra ◽  
Rebecca L. Wingard ◽  
Lorien S. Dalrymple ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 580-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Lavoie Smith ◽  
Rylie Haupt ◽  
James Kelly ◽  
Deborah Lee ◽  
Grace Kanzawa-Lee ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2933-2940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise H. Strickland ◽  
Thomas W. Hamilton ◽  
Crispin C. Jenkinson ◽  
David W. Murray ◽  
Hemant G. Pandit

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne M. Parslow ◽  
Alison Shaw ◽  
Kirstie L. Haywood ◽  
Esther Crawley

Abstract Background There is a lack of patient derived, child specific outcome measures to capture what health outcomes are important to children with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). We developed a new Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for paediatric CFS/ME through qualitative research with children. This study aimed to pre-test the new measure through cognitive interviews with children with CFS/ME. Methods Cognitive interviews were undertaken in children’s homes or over Skype. The Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI) method was used to assess the quality of the draft PROM with children with CFS/ME to identify problems with initial content and design and test modifications over subsequent interview rounds. Children were purposively sampled from a single specialist paediatric CFS/ME service in England. Results Twenty-four children and their parents took part. They felt the new measure captured issues relevant to their condition and preferred it to the generic measures they completed in clinical assessment. Changes were made to item content and phrasing, timeframe and response options and tested through three rounds of interviews. Conclusions Cognitive interviews identified problems with the draft PROM, enabling us to make changes and then confirm acceptability in children aged 11–18. Further cognitive interviews are required with children 8–10 years old to examine the acceptability and content validity and provide evidence for age related cut offs of the new PROM to meet FDA standards. This study demonstrates the content validity of the new measure as relevant and acceptable for children with CFS/ME. The next stage is to undertake a psychometric evaluation to support the reduction of items, confirm the structure of the PROM and provide evidence of the data quality, reliability and validity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document