scholarly journals Natural deduction in normal modal logic.

1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hawthorn
2021 ◽  
pp. 64-81
Author(s):  
Atefeh Rohani ◽  
Thomas Studer

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 436-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
GURAM BEZHANISHVILI ◽  
NICK BEZHANISHVILI ◽  
JULIA ILIN

AbstractStable logics are modal logics characterized by a class of frames closed under relation preserving images. These logics admit all filtrations. Since many basic modal systems such as K4 and S4 are not stable, we introduce the more general concept of an M-stable logic, where M is an arbitrary normal modal logic that admits some filtration. Of course, M can be chosen to be K4 or S4. We give several characterizations of M-stable logics. We prove that there are continuum many S4-stable logics and continuum many K4-stable logics between K4 and S4. We axiomatize K4-stable and S4-stable logics by means of stable formulas and discuss the connection between S4-stable logics and stable superintuitionistic logics. We conclude the article with many examples (and nonexamples) of stable, K4-stable, and S4-stable logics and provide their axiomatization in terms of stable rules and formulas.


1981 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Schotch ◽  
R. E. Jennings

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-428
Author(s):  
GIOVANNA D'AGOSTINO ◽  
ALBERTO MARCONE

Building on previous work by Mummert et al. (2015, The modal logic of Reverse Mathematics. Archive for Mathematical54 (3–4) 425–437), we study the logic underlying the web of implications and non-implications which constitute the so called reverse mathematics zoo. We introduce a tableaux system for this logic and natural deduction systems for important fragments of the language.


2006 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Teresa Martins ◽  
Lília Ramalho Martins

Studia Logica ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slavian Radev

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
SERGEI P. ODINTSOV ◽  
STANISLAV O. SPERANSKI

AbstractWe shall be concerned with the modal logic BK—which is based on the Belnap–Dunn four-valued matrix, and can be viewed as being obtained from the least normal modal logic K by adding ‘strong negation’. Though all four values ‘truth’, ‘falsity’, ‘neither’ and ‘both’ are employed in its Kripke semantics, only the first two are expressible as terms. We show that expanding the original language of BK to include constants for ‘neither’ or/and ‘both’ leads to quite unexpected results. To be more precise, adding one of these constants has the effect of eliminating the respective value at the level of BK-extensions. In particular, if one adds both of these, then the corresponding lattice of extensions turns out to be isomorphic to that of ordinary normal modal logics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document