Abstract: Optimising Well Casing Design In A Frontier Deepwater Basin Using Real Time Pore Pressure Prediction Whilst Drilling

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES, SIMON, JOAN HORBEEK, and TOR
Geofluids ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jincai Zhang ◽  
Shangxian Yin

High uncertainties may exist in the predrill pore pressure prediction in new prospects and deepwater subsalt wells; therefore, real-time pore pressure detection is highly needed to reduce drilling risks. The methods for pore pressure detection (the resistivity, sonic, and corrected d-exponent methods) are improved using the depth-dependent normal compaction equations to adapt to the requirements of the real-time monitoring. A new method is proposed to calculate pore pressure from the connection gas or elevated background gas, which can be used for real-time pore pressure detection. The pore pressure detection using the logging-while-drilling, measurement-while-drilling, and mud logging data is also implemented and evaluated. Abnormal pore pressure indicators from the well logs, mud logs, and wellbore instability events are identified and analyzed to interpret abnormal pore pressures for guiding real-time drilling decisions. The principles for identifying abnormal pressure indicators are proposed to improve real-time pore pressure monitoring.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. ID1-ID12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Paglia ◽  
Jo Eidsvik ◽  
Arnt Grøver ◽  
Ane Elisabet Lothe

The challenge of pore pressure prediction in an overpressured area near a well is studied. Predrill understanding of pore pressure is available from a 3D geologic model for pressure buildup and release using a basin modeling approach. The pore pressure distribution is updated when well logs are gathered while drilling. Sequential Bayesian methods are used to conduct real-time pore pressure prediction, meaning that every time new well logs are available, the pore pressure distribution is automatically updated ahead of the bit and in every spatial direction (north, east, and depth), with associated uncertainty quantification. Spatial modeling of pore pressure variables means that the data at one well depth location will also be informative of the pore pressure variables at other depths and lateral locations. A workflow is exemplified using real data. The prior model is based on a Gaussian process fitted from geologic modeling of this field, whereas the likelihood model of well-log data is assessed from data in an exploration well in the same area. Results are presented by replaying a drilling situation in this context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document