scholarly journals Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: changing trends in management

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 650-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Roy ◽  
R Mukherjee ◽  
M Parik

Over the past three decades, management of blunt splenic trauma has changed radically. Use of improved diagnostic techniques and proper understanding of disease pathology has led to nonoperative management being chosen as the standard of care in patients who are haemodynamically stable. This review was undertaken to assess available literature regarding changing trends of management of blunt splenic trauma, and to identify the existing lacunae in nonoperative management.The PubMed database was searched for studies published between January 1987 and August 2017, using the keywords ‘blunt splenic trauma’ and ‘nonoperative management’. One hundred and fifty-three articles were reviewed, of which 82 free full texts and free abstracts were used in the current review.There is clear evidence in published literature of the greater success of nonoperative over operative management in patients who are haemodynamically stable and the increasing utility of adjunctive therapies like angiography with embolisation. However, the review revealed a lack of universal guidelines for patient selection criteria and diagnostic and grading procedures needed for nonoperative management. Indications for splenic artery embolisation, the current role of splenectomy and spleen-preserving surgeries, together with the place of minimal access surgery in blunt splenic trauma remain grey areas. Moreover, parameters affecting the outcomes of nonoperative management and its failure and management need to be defined. This shows a need for future studies focused on these shortcomings with the ultimate aim being the formulation and implementation of universally accepted guidelines for safe and efficient management of blunt splenic trauma.

Author(s):  
JOSÉ DONIZETI MEIRA JÚNIOR ◽  
CARLOS AUGUSTO METIDIERI MENEGOZZO ◽  
MARCELO CRISTIANO ROCHA ◽  
EDIVALDO MASSAZO UTIYAMA

ABSTRACT The spleen is one of the most frequently affected organs in blunt abdominal trauma. Since Upadhyaya, the treatment of splenic trauma has undergone important changes. Currently, the consensus is that every splenic trauma presenting with hemodynamic stability should be initially treated nonoperatively, provided that the hospital has adequate structure and the patient does not present other conditions that indicate abdominal exploration. However, several topics regarding the nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic trauma are still controversial. Splenic angioembolization is a very useful tool for NOM, but there is no consensus on its precise indications. There is no definition in the literature as to how NOM should be conducted, neither about the periodicity of hematimetric control, the transfusion threshold that defines NOM failure, when to start venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, the need for control imaging, the duration of bed rest, and when it is safe to discharge the patient. The aim of this review is to make a critical analysis of the most recent literature on this topic, exposing the state of the art in the NOM of splenic trauma.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Majd Habash ◽  
Darrel Ceballos ◽  
Andrew J. Gunn

AbstractThe spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable due to splenic trauma undergo definitive operative management. Interventional radiology plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of the hemodynamically stable trauma patient with splenic injury. Hemodynamically stable patients selected for nonoperative management have improved clinical outcomes when splenic artery embolization is utilized. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization for patients with high-grade splenic injuries.


1989 ◽  
Vol 210 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER E. LONGO ◽  
CHRISTOPHER C. BAKER ◽  
MARVIN A. McMILLEN ◽  
IRVIN M. MODLIN ◽  
LINDA C. DEGUTIS ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 2404-2411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navpreet K. Dhillon ◽  
Galinos Barmparas ◽  
Gretchen M. Thomsen ◽  
Kavita A. Patel ◽  
Nikhil T. Linaval ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document