scholarly journals Patient positioning for tension band wiring of olecranon fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
A Patel ◽  
K Shepherd ◽  
K Karthik
Author(s):  
Ida K. Rantalaiho ◽  
Inari E. Laaksonen ◽  
Anssi J. Ryösä ◽  
Katariina Perkonoja ◽  
Kari J. Isotalo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lokesh Kumar Yogi ◽  
Gagandeep Mahi ◽  
C. R. Thorat ◽  
Moti Janardhan Naik

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Fractures of olecranon are common fractures in upper limb. Tension band wiring (TBW) and plate fixation (PF) are mostly used techniques but choice is based on type of fracture and surgeon’s preference.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong>  A study assessed functional results in 28 patients that were enrolled after the clinical event of trauma has occurred. Patients were divided into two groups- Group (A) for TBW and Group (B) for PF; here gender, age and side of fracture were ignored. Post-operative functional outcome were evaluated by using the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score parameters.</p><p><strong>Results:<em> </em></strong>Mean (SD) union time as determined by postoperative radiographs was 8.5 (1.48) weeks for group (A) and 9 (2.08) weeks for group (B). Mean (SD) MEP score at 9 months in group (A) 84.28 (7.28) and 80.71 (10.92) in group (B). Mean (SD) DASH at 9 months in group (A) 12.2 (8.8) and 11.7 (10.4) in group (B). Complications were reported in group (A) 6 patient (42.85%) out of 14 patients and in group (B) 1 patient (7.14%) out of 14 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:<em> </em></strong>The current study shows that there are no significant differences in functional outcome between both the study groups. Due to lesser complications, we recommend the plate fixation approach as the better choice for transverse displaced olecranon fractures. More large scale studies are required to further confirm our results.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem-Maarten P. F. Bosman ◽  
Benjamin L. Emmink ◽  
Abhiram R. Bhashyam ◽  
R. Marijn Houwert ◽  
Jort Keizer

Abstract Purpose Olecranon fractures are common and typically require surgical fixation due to displacement generated by the pull of the triceps muscle. The most common techniques for repairing olecranon fractures are tension-band wiring or plate fixation, but these methods are associated with high rates of implant-related soft-tissue irritation. Another treatment option is fixation with an intramedullary screw, but less is known about surgical results using this strategy. Thus, the purpose of this study was to report the clinical and functional outcomes of olecranon fractures treated with an intramedullary cannulated screw. Methods We identified 15 patients (average age at index procedure 44 years, range 16–83) with a Mayo type I or IIA olecranon fracture who were treated with an intramedullary cannulated screw at a single level 2 trauma center between 2012 and 2017. The medical record was reviewed to assess radiographic union, postoperative range of motion and complications (including hardware removal). Patient-reported outcome was evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Average follow-up was 22 months (range 8–36 months). Results By the 6th month post-operative visit, 14 patients had complete union of their fracture and 1 patient had an asymptomatic non-union that did not require further intervention. Average flexion was 145° (range 135–160) and the average extension lag was 11° (range 0–30). Implants were removed in 5 patients due to soft-tissue irritation. Average DASH score (± standard deviation) by final follow-up was 16 ± 10. Conclusions Fixation of simple olecranon fractures with an intramedullary screw is a safe and easy fixation method in young patients, leading to good functional and radiological results. Compared to available data, less hardware removal is necessary than with tension-band wiring or plate fixation.


Injury ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Assom ◽  
Nicola Lollino ◽  
Francesco Caranzano ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Filippo Castoldi

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadim Aslam ◽  
Sunil Nair ◽  
George Ampat ◽  
Keith Willett

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Martínez Romero ◽  
André Miran ◽  
Claus Hjorth Jensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document