hardware removal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

185
(FIVE YEARS 88)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Orthopedics ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Colton Ryan ◽  
Mark L. Dunleavy ◽  
Alex Burton ◽  
William Hennrikus
Keyword(s):  

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
Eva Lundqvist ◽  
Per Fischer ◽  
Per Wretenberg ◽  
Wolfgang Krauss ◽  
Marcus Sagerfors

Background: Volar locking plate fixation is the most common method of operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs). For more complex cases, combined plating is an option for stabilizing intra-articular fragments. The prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis (PA) after an intra-articular DRF, and its relation to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to study the prevalence of PA and its correlation to clinical outcome measures. Methods: We evaluated 97 consecutive patients with intra-articular DRF, operated with combined plating, 7 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of radiographic PA. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, hand grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Radiographic examination was performed between 1 and 7 years postoperatively. Results: The prevalence of PA was 29% at the 7-year follow-up. No correlation was found between PA and ROM, hand grip strength, PRWE, QuickDASH, VAS pain scores, or radiographic reduction. Median wrist ROM and grip strength were significantly inferior compared with the uninjured side. Hardware removal was performed in 51.5% of cases. There were 2 cases of tendon ruptures. Conclusions: Combined plating can yield a good clinical outcome 7 years postoperatively and a low prevalence of PA. The presence of PA did not correlate to clinical outcome measures or to the accuracy of anatomical reduction 1 year postoperatively. The frequency of tendon ruptures was acceptable, but the high frequency of hardware removal is a concern.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Kellam ◽  
John Harrast ◽  
Maxwell Weinberg ◽  
David F. Martin ◽  
Nathan P. Davidson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 208-210
Author(s):  
Sanjay V. Popere ◽  
Mohit R. Shete ◽  
Siddharth S. Vakil ◽  
Abhay Kulkarni ◽  
Karan Pandav

Introduction: Distal humeral fractures accounts for approximately 2% of all fractures and nearly onethird of humeral fractures in adults. In this regard, Double Tension Band Wiring (DTBW) technique was used for the xation of the distal humeral fractures type C1 (AO) to evaluate the early movement and complications of the patients. Methodology: This study was conducted on 38 patients of C1 (AO type)who were subjected to open reduction and internal xation using DTBW techniques, to evaluate the incidence of complications and to evaluate intraoperative parameters and postoperative functional outcomes over a period of 12 months. Results: The mean age of the participants was 43.7 years. The mean tourniquet time was 76 minutes. The mean union time was 11.4 weeks and the mean duration of the follow-ups was 13.72 months. The mean values for the lack of extension, exion, and range of motion were 12.24o, 120.9o, and 108.2o respectively. Neuropraxia was observed in 1 patient who was treated with conservative treatment. Mean MEPS score was 80.15. 17 patients had excellent scores , 12 had good scores and 9 had fair scores. None had poor scores. Hardware prominence was observed in 1 case which was treated with hardware removal after union was achieved. Hardware removal was performed 6 months after the surgery. Moreover, patients were diagnosed with no serious complications, such as the nonunion of fracture site, malunions, and deep infection. The radiological examination of the patients revealed the success of their treatment. Conclusions: Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that DTBW is an effective technique in AO type C1 fracture xation, which allows gentle early motion. Moreover, this cost-effective technique decreased the surgery duration, tourniquet time, and damage caused by soft tissue stripping.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik S. Contreras ◽  
Daniel J. Lynch ◽  
Sarah Hatef ◽  
Amy L. Speeckaert ◽  
Kanu S. Goyal

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-365
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Yazdi ◽  
John Y. Kwon ◽  
Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini ◽  
Alireza Yousof Gomrokchi ◽  
Paniz Motaghi

Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) injury may require operative treatment. Marx et al. described the latest technique for reconstruction of MCL. While good results have been reported using the Marx technique, some issues have been observed. To address the mentioned issues, a modification to the Marx technique has been devised. Eleven patients were enrolled and their ligaments were repaired by the fixation of allograft on the proximal and distal attachment footprints of the superficial MCL. For preventing loss of knee ROM, MCL and other ligaments were reconstructed in 2 separate stages. At the last follow up the ROM, knee ligament laxity and functional outcome scores, subjective (IKDC) and Lysholm score were evaluated and recorded. Knee motion was maintained in all cases. Two cases demonstrated 1+ valgus instability at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Both were treated for combined MCL and PCL tear, the rest were stable. The average IKDC-subjective score was 93 ± 4 and the average Lysholm score was 92 ± 3. All patients were satisfied and returned to their previous level of activity. In this technique, the superficial MCL was recon- structed closer to its anatomical construct. Patients didn’t have any complaints of hardware under the skin and the need for a second surgery for hardware removal was avoided. Patients didn’t have any complaints of hardware under the skin and the need for a second surgery for hardware removal was avoided. Also reconstructing the ligaments in 2 stages helped to preserve the knee motion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Chithra Aramanadka ◽  
Abhay T. Kamath ◽  
G. Srikanth ◽  
Deepika Pai ◽  
Nishu Singla ◽  
...  

Background. Miniplates are commonly used for the fixation of maxillofacial fracture segments. Removal of the hardware is controversial. A retrospective study of medical records was performed to observe the reasons for plate removal. Materials and Methods. A 10-year retrospective study of medical records was performed. Demographics, type of fracture, location, type of miniplate used, the time gap between the insertion and removal, and causes of hardware removal were assessed. Results. About 1472 patients had undergone internal fixation for the facial fractures. Stainless steel miniplate was used in 489 patients, and titanium was used in 983 patients. Out of the 42 cases, 22 cases involved the removal of titanium hardware and 20 patients involved the removal of stainless steel hardware. Infection/osteomyelitis was the main cause of hardware removal. The maximum amount of hardware failure was in the mandible. 78.6% of hardware removal was performed in males. Conclusion. Based on our study, routine removal of titanium miniplates can be performed in children to avoid growth disturbances, not indicated in adult patients unless symptomatic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document