Assessing the Utility of a PCR Diagnostics Marker for the Identification of Africanized Honey Bee, Apis mellifera L., (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the United States.

Sociobiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Szalanski ◽  
Amber Tripodi
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257701
Author(s):  
Gabriela M. Quinlan ◽  
Meghan O. Milbrath ◽  
Clint R. V. Otto ◽  
Rufus Isaacs

Agriculturally important commercially managed pollinators including honey bees (Apis mellifera L., 1758) and bumble bees (Bombus impatiens Cresson, 1863) rely on the surrounding landscape to fulfill their dietary needs. A previous study in Europe demonstrated that managed honey bee foragers and unmanaged native bumble bee foragers are associated with different land uses. However, it is unclear how response to land use compares between managed honey bees and a managed native bumble bee species in the United States, where honey bees are an imported species. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no such direct comparisons of bee responses to land use have been made at the colony level. To better understand how two different social bees respond to variation in land use, we monitored the weights of A. mellifera and B. impatiens colonies placed in 12 apiaries across a range of land use in Michigan, United States in 2017. Bombus impatiens colonies gained more weight and produced more drones when surrounded by diverse agricultural land (i.e., non-corn/soybean cropland such as tree fruits and grapes), while honey bee colonies gained more weight when surrounded by more grassland/pasture land. These findings add to our understanding of how different bee species respond to agricultural landscapes, highlighting the need for further species-specific land use studies to inform tailored land management.


Genetica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo P. Porrini ◽  
Constanza Brasesco ◽  
Matias Maggi ◽  
Martín J. Eguaras ◽  
Silvina Quintana

Chemosphere ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiana Antonia Tavares ◽  
Thaisa Cristina Roat ◽  
Stephan Malfitano Carvalho ◽  
Elaine Cristina Mathias Silva-Zacarin ◽  
Osmar Malaspina

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Libardoni ◽  
Alfredo De Gouvea ◽  
Fabiana Martins Costa-Maia ◽  
Everton Ricardi Lozano ◽  
Patrícia Franchi de Freitas ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of three strains of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) on the longevity of workers of Africanized honey bee. Solutions at a concentration of 3 × 108 spores.mL-1 (dosage) were prepared for each strain of Bt (IPS 82, BR 81, and BR 147). Three bioassays were performed as follows: spraying on the bees, contact with the sprayed surface, and candy paste incorporated with Bt. The bees of the Bt bioassay were submitted to histological analysis of the mesenteron. The longevity of workers was assessed from one to 120 hours using different ranges. It was found that the bees that were exposed to the strain of Bt IPS 82, in the spraying test, exhibited a reduced longevity. In the contact test, the BR 147 strain reduced the longevity of the bees. In the food test, in turn, the three studied strains reduced the longevity of the bees as follows: Bt IPS 82: 64.5 hours; Bt BR 81: 64.5 hours; and Bt BR 147: 60.0 hours. The Bt BR 81 strain was considered the most selective of the evaluated strains on Apis mellifera, reducing the longevity of this bee only when it came into contact by the method of ingestion.


1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. I. Abramson ◽  
I. S. Aquino ◽  
F. S. Ramalho ◽  
J. M. Price

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document