scholarly journals Nesting, Protective and Foraging Behavior of Oecophylla smaragdina (Weaver Ants) in Anand, Gujarat

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-357
Author(s):  
Divyangi Patel ◽  
Nikunj Bhatt
Biotropica ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Offenberg ◽  
Sopon Havanon ◽  
Sanit Aksornkoae ◽  
Donald J. Macintosh ◽  
Mogens Gissel Nielsen

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2112
Author(s):  
Vivek Kempraj ◽  
Soo Jean Park ◽  
Stefano De Faveri ◽  
Phillip W. Taylor

The green tree ant, Oecophylla smaragdina, is one of only two recognized species of weaver ants. While the identity and functions of chemicals produced and emitted by its congener O. longinoda have been studied quite extensively and serve as a valuable model in chemical ecology research, little comparable information is available about O. smaragdina. Although some analyses of chemicals produced and emitted by O. smaragdina have been reported, the literature is fragmentary and incomplete for this species. To address this knowledge gap, and to enable comparisons in the chemical ecology of the two weaver ant species, we here describe diverse chemicals from the cuticle, Dufour’s glands, poison glands, head, headspace volatiles, and trails of O. smaragdina.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-48
Author(s):  
M. Ubaidilah Hasan Hasan ◽  
La Ode Fitradiansyah Fitradiansyah ◽  
Fera Susanti Susanti ◽  
Rika Raffiudin

Weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina are social insects that recognize nestmates using pheromone. This study analyzes the feeding behavior and nestmate recognition of weaver ants in the urban area of three different islands (Sumatra: Baturaja; Java: Banyuwangi; Papua: Sorong). The free ants were placed in the arena composed of chicken meat, sugar, bananas as the baits. Ten trapped ants were also located in the arena to explore the nestmate recognition between the free and the trapped ants. Five types of behaviors, i.e., approach, stalking, communication, competition, and agonistic, were recorded in 6 days. Food preferences were indicated by the number of conduct towards the feeding sites, and nestmate recognition was indicated by approaching the trapped nestmate. The results showed that the percentage of the approach behavior of free ants was the highest in the three islands but had no significant difference between Sumatra and Java and between Java and Sorong (p-value >0.05). However, the study showed significant differences for the other four behaviors observed. As predicted, the percentage of chicken meat foraged by the ants was the highest due to the carnivorous behavior. The free ants showed the nestmate recognition to the trapped ants in all behavior, except competition.  


2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki TSUJI ◽  
Ahsol HASYIM ◽  
Harlion ◽  
Koji NAKAMURA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajesh Vijayan ◽  
Chethana Casiker ◽  
Divya Uma

AbstractAnts, being ubiquitous, aggressive, and top predators, play a predominant role in terrestrial ecosystems. Jumping spiders are another prominent invertebrate predator that are present in similar habitats as that of ants. Most jumping spiders are thought to avoid ants, yet little is known if they discriminate among them. In this study we examined the response of jumping spider genus Plexippus towards three different ant species (Oecophylla smaragdina, the weaver ants; Camponotus sericeus the golden-back carpenter ants, and Leptogenys processionalis, the procession ants). In a behavioral assay that excluded tactile and chemical cues, we tested if spiders distinguish the three ants by visual cues alone. We recorded and analysed behaviors such as ‘look’, ‘approach’, ‘stalk’, ‘attack’, and ‘avoidance’ by spiders towards ants. Our results show that the three ants differ in their color, movement and aggressive behavior. Spiders gave ‘short looks’ to live ants, suggesting movement is important in detecting ants. Furthermore, spiders gave significantly more ‘long looks’ to procession and golden-back ants compared to weaver ants. Spiders approached, stalked and attacked procession ants more compared to weaver ants. Numerous jumping spiders and ants overlap in their habitat, and it is advantageous to selectively avoid some ants over others. Our results suggests that jumping spiders can indeed distinguish ants that co-occur in their habitat by visual cues alone, however, the precise nature of visual cues warrants further studies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Azuma ◽  
K. Ogata ◽  
T. Kikuchi ◽  
S. Higashi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document