Amerasian Children, Hybrid Superiority, and Pearl S. Buck's Transracial and Transnational Adoption Activism

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-209
Author(s):  
Kori A. Graves
Evolution ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Good ◽  
Julie C. Ellis ◽  
Cynthia A. Annett ◽  
Raymond Pierotti

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Rizqia Nuur Maziyya

Transnational adoption has become one of the factors of transnational migration to Western countries, including America. Transnational adoption can be viewed from at least two perspectives, South Korea as the origin country and America as the targeted country. From the birth country, transnational adoption becomes a way to help the children from poverty, have a better future, and contribute to the birth country when they return. From the adoption-targeted country, this adoption is a humanitarian way to save the children from poverty, primitive way of life, and God’s blessing. One of the countries which regularly “send” the children to Western countries is South Korea. The children become Korean adoptees and mostly living in white American neighborhoods. Living with white Americans has shaped the Korean adoptees’ behavior and way of thinking same as Americans. Korean adoptees face various problems, starting from adjusting themselves in new environment, finding their cultural roots and identity, and struggling to find their biological parents. This study employed Phinnes’ ethnic identity development to make sense of the experience of a Korean adoptee called Nicole Chung in her memoir, All You Can Ever Know: A Memoir of Adoption. Through the discussion, it can be understood how transnational adoption programs become national agenda and big business field since it is not expensive to have children from other countries. There is also an assumption that the children will have better and happier life when they are taken to America and other western countries. However, throughout their life as adopted children in America, the children also find difficulties, especially in finding their identity.


1983 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1264-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Halliburton ◽  
R. E. Pipkin ◽  
G. A. E. Gall

Golden trout (Salmo aguabonita) were artificially crossed to hatchery rainbow trout (S. gairdneri). Interspecific matings were as fertile as intraspecific matings, and hatchability and survival to 35 d were not significantly different among the mating types. Embryos derived from golden trout eggs hatched sooner than those derived from rainbow eggs, and G♂ × R♀ hybrids were significantly larger than golden trout or rainbow trout at 165 d. Hybrid males were significantly more fertile than golden trout or rainbow trout males, and hatchability of the eggs from hybrid females was significantly higher than that of eggs from golden trout females. However, this apparent hybrid superiority may not be genetic. The results suggest that postzygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms between the two species are very weak or nonexistent, at least through the F1 generation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document