Insulin glulisine: A human insulin analog

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 433 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Cox
Allergy ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Barranco ◽  
T. Herrero ◽  
P. Tornero ◽  
M. Barrio ◽  
C. Frutos ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (14) ◽  
pp. 6239-6243 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Vincent ◽  
R. J. Carroll ◽  
R. E. Hammer ◽  
S. J. Chan ◽  
Y. Guz ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Stammberger ◽  
Gerhard Seipke ◽  
Thomas Bartels

Receptor binding and signaling and the mitogenic potential of insulin glulisine (glulisine), regular human insulin (RHI), and Asp(B10) were compared in vivo and in vitro. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) receptor binding was studied with human insulin receptors (293HEK cells) and the human osteosarcoma-derived cell line B10. Insulin receptor–mediated signaling was assessed in rat-1 fibroblasts overexpressing insulin receptors. Activation of insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 (IRS-1/IRS-2) was studied in rat and human myoblasts and rat cardiomyocytes. DNA synthesis induction was assessed by [3H] thymidine incorporation in the human epithelial breast cell line MCF10. Interaction with the IGF-1 receptor, DNA synthesis, and intracellular signal transduction were assessed in cardiac K6 myoblasts. Immunohistochemical examination of Sprague-Dawley rat tissue treated with glulisine for 6 months ( n = 40), and glulisine and RHI for 12 months ( n = 60), was performed. Steady-state insulin receptor binding affinity was slightly lower for glulisine versus RHI (~0.70). IGF-1 receptor binding affinity was lower (four-to fivefold) for glulisine, but significantly higher (four-fold) for Asp(B10) versus RHI. Glulisine, Asp(B10), and RHI showed similar insulin receptor–association kinetics; however, Asp(B10) revealed increased insulin receptor affinity. Glulisine and RHI showed similar insulin receptor–mediated phosphorylation and IRS-2 activation. Activation of IRS-1 was 6- to 10-fold lower with glulisine; glulisine was less potent and Asp(B10) slightly more potent in stimulating DNA synthesis versus RHI. Stimulation of DNA synthesis was comparable for glulisine and RHI in K6 myoblasts. At 12 months, there was no significant difference between glulisine and RHI in proliferative activity. This preclinical evaluation suggests that structural changes in glulisine versus RHI are not associated with any safety issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document