scholarly journals The Effects of Aging, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Trail-Making Test Performance

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0124345 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Woods ◽  
John M. Wyma ◽  
Timothy J. Herron ◽  
E. William Yund
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Allen ◽  
Nicholas S. Thaler ◽  
Erik N. Ringdahl ◽  
Sally J. Barney ◽  
Joan Mayfield

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 798-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
J. F. Linck ◽  
D. J. Heyanka ◽  
N. J. Pastorek ◽  
B. Miller ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1018-1018
Author(s):  
P Litvin ◽  
R Rugh-Fraser ◽  
W Lopez-Hernandez ◽  
J Knight ◽  
R Cervantes ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a number of cognitive deficits. Language factors also impact neurocognitive performance. We examined the effects of TBI and bilingualism/monolingualism on a test of attention and executive functioning (Trail Making Test; TMT). Method The sample (N = 96) consisted of 36 healthy controls (19 bilingual; 17 monolingual), 34 acute TBI participants (12 bilingual; 21 monolingual), and 27 chronic TBI participants (16 bilingual; 11 monolingual). Acute TBI participants were tested 6 months post-injury and chronic TBI participants were tested 12 months or more post-injury. 3X2 ANOVAs were conducted to determine the effect of TBI and bilingualism/monolingualism on TMT part A and B. Results Main effects were found between groups (i.e., control and TBI groups) on TMT A, p < .001, ηp² = .17 and TMT B, p < .05, ηp² = .09. Pairwise comparisons revealed a difference only between the control group and the 6-month TBI group, with the latter performing worse. Main effects were found for bilingualism/monolingualism on TMT A, p < .05, ηp² = .04 and TMT B, p < .05, ηp² = .05; monolingual participants performed better than bilingual participants. No interactions emerged. Conclusion Relative to monolinguals, bilingual participants demonstrated worse attention and executive functioning performances 6 months post-TBI; however, 12 months post-TBI, the difference was negligible.


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 897-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rael T. Lange ◽  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Martin J. Zakrzewski ◽  
Patrick E. Ethel-King ◽  
Michael D. Franzen

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Thaler ◽  
D. N. Allen ◽  
J. S. Hart ◽  
J. R. Boucher ◽  
J. C. McMurray ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
J PERIANEZ ◽  
M RIOSLAGO ◽  
J RODRIGUEZSANCHEZ ◽  
D ADROVERROIG ◽  
I SANCHEZCUBILLO ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 868-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Egeto ◽  
Shaylea D. Badovinac ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Tisha J. Ornstein ◽  
Tom A. Schweizer

Abstract Objectives: Guidelines on return-to-driving after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are scarce. Since driving requires the coordination of multiple cognitive, perceptual, and psychomotor functions, neuropsychological testing may offer an estimate of driving ability. To examine this, a meta-analysis of the relationship between neuropsychological testing and driving ability after TBI was performed. Methods: Hedge’s g and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. Analyses were performed on cognitive domains and individual tests. Meta-regressions examined the influence of study design, demographic, and clinical factors on effect sizes. Results: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Executive functions had the largest effect size (g = 0.60 [0.39–0.80]), followed by verbal memory (g = 0.49 [0.27–0.71]), processing speed/attention (g = 0.48 [0.29–0.67]), and visual memory (g = 0.43 [0.14–0.71]). Of the individual tests, Useful Field of Vision (UFOV) divided attention (g = 1.12 [0.52–1.72]), Trail Making Test B (g = 0.75 [0.42–1.08]), and UFOV selective attention (g = 0.67 [0.22–1.12]) had the largest effects. The effect sizes for Choice Reaction Time test and Trail Making Test A were g = 0.63 (0.09–1.16) and g = 0.58 (0.10–1.06), respectively. Years post injury (β = 0.11 [0.02–0.21] and age (β = 0.05 [0.009–0.09]) emerged as significant predictors of effect sizes (both p &lt; .05). Conclusions: These results provide preliminary evidence of associations between neuropsychological test performance and driving ability after moderate to severe TBI and highlight moderating effects of demographic and clinical factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document