scholarly journals Correction: Pru p 9, a new allergen eliciting respiratory symptoms in subjects sensitized to peach tree pollen

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0232301
Author(s):  
Miguel Blanca ◽  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
María Garrido-Arandia ◽  
Laura Martin-Pedraza ◽  
Alejandro Romero Sahagún ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. AB235
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Somoza ◽  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
Natalia Blanca-Lopez ◽  
Elisa Haroun Diaz ◽  
Maria Garrido Arandia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. AB72
Author(s):  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
Maria Somoza Alvarez ◽  
Jose Damian Lopez Sanchez ◽  
Maria Garrido-Arandia ◽  
Laura Martín-Pedraza ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0230010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Blanca ◽  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
María Garrido-Arandia ◽  
Laura Martin-Pedraza ◽  
Alejandro Romero Sahagún ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
Maria Luisa Somoza ◽  
José Damián López-Sánchez ◽  
María Garrido-Arandia ◽  
Araceli Díaz-Perales ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Somoza ◽  
María Garrido‐Arandia ◽  
Laura Victorio Puche ◽  
José Damián López‐Sánchez ◽  
Natalia Blanca‐López ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. oemed-2020-106641
Author(s):  
Laura Victorio-Puche ◽  
Maria Luisa Somoza ◽  
Laura Martin-Pedraza ◽  
Enrique Fernandez-Caldas ◽  
Eva Abel Fernandez ◽  
...  

ObjectivesSeveral studies have described peach tree (PT) as an occupational allergen. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of Prunus persica 9 (Pru p 9), a recently identified allergen from PT pollen, in exposed workers.MethodsThe study included people who reported respiratory symptoms after handling PT in orchards during the flowering period (Blanca village, Murcia region, south-east Spain). After completing a detailed questionnaire, participants underwent skin prick test (SPT) and nasal provocation test (NPT). The IgE response was analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting assays.ResultsA total of 21 cases were included (mean age 45 years; 57% women). Most were polysensitised to common pollens, although one person was sensitised only to PT pollen. All cases had a positive SPT to this pollen, and 43% also to Pru p 9. All participants reported having rhinitis, and six participants reported having also asthma. Immunoblotting showed a heterogeneous IgE pattern for several proteins, with Pru p 9 recognised in nine cases. Most participants sensitised to PT pollen and Pru p 9 had positive NPTs, while those who were not sensitised to Pru p 9 tested negative.ConclusionsWe demonstrate for the first time that Pru p 9, an allergen from PT pollen, can induce respiratory symptoms following occupational exposure. This must be considered a relevant allergen when people working with PT cultivars develop respiratory symptoms.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255305
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Somoza ◽  
Natalia Pérez-Sánchez ◽  
Laura Victorio-Puche ◽  
Laura Martín-Pedraza ◽  
Angel Esteban Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Peach tree allergens are present in fruit, pollen, branches, and leaves, and can induce systemic, respiratory, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal symptoms. We studied the capacity of peach fruit/Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7 and peach pollen/Pru p 9 for inducing symptoms following oral or respiratory exposure in a large group of subjects. We included 716 adults (aged 21 to 83 y.o.) exposed to peach tree pollen and fruit intake in the study population. Participants completed a questionnaire and were skin tested with a panel of inhalant and food allergens, including peach tree pollen, Pru p 9 and peach fruit skin extract. Immunoglobulin E antibodies (SIgE) to Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4 and Pru p 7 were quantified. Sensitised subjects underwent oral food challenge with peach fruit and nasal provocation test with peach tree pollen and Pru p 9. The prevalence of sensitisation to peach fruit was 5% and most of these had SIgE to Pru p 3, with a very low proportion to Pru p 4 SIgE and no SIgE to Pru p 1 and Pru p 7. In only 1.8%, anaphylaxis was the clinical entity induced. Cases with positive skin tests to peach and SIgE to Pru p 3 presented a good tolerance after oral challenge with peach fruit. The prevalence of skin sensitisation to peach tree pollen was 22%, with almost half recognising Pru p 9. This induced respiratory symptoms in those evaluated by nasal provocation. In a large population group exposed to peach fruit and peach tree pollen, most individuals were tolerant, even in those with SIgE to Pru p 3. A positive response to Pru p 9 was associated with respiratory allergy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document