scholarly journals Constructing robust and efficient experimental designs in groundwater modeling using a Galerkin method, proper orthogonal decomposition, and metaheuristic algorithms

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0254620
Author(s):  
Timothy T. Ushijima ◽  
William W. G. Yeh ◽  
Weng Kee Wong

Estimating parameters accurately in groundwater models for aquifers is challenging because the models are non-explicit solutions of complex partial differential equations. Modern research methods, such as Monte Carlo methods and metaheuristic algorithms, for searching an efficient design to estimate model parameters require hundreds, if not thousands of model calls, making the computational cost prohibitive. One method to circumvent the problem and gain valuable insight on the behavior of groundwater is to first apply a Galerkin method and convert the system of partial differential equations governing the flow to a discrete problem and then use a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to project the high-dimensional model space of the original groundwater model to create a reduced groundwater model with much lower dimensions. The reduced model can be solved several orders of magnitude faster than the full model and able to provide an accurate estimate of the full model. The task is still challenging because the optimization problem is non-convex, non-differentiable and there are continuous variables and integer-valued variables to optimize. Following convention, heuristic algorithms and a combination is used search to find efficient designs for the reduced groundwater model using various optimality criteria. The main goals are to introduce new design criteria and the concept of design efficiency for experimental design research in hydrology. The two criteria have good utility but interestingly, do not seem to have been implemented in hydrology. In addition, design efficiency is introduced. Design efficiency is a method to assess how robust a design is under a change of criteria. The latter is an important issue because the design criterion may be subjectively selected and it is well known that an optimal design can perform poorly under another criterion. It is thus desirable that the implemented design has relatively high efficiencies under a few criteria. As applications, two heuristic algorithms are used to find optimal designs for a small synthetic aquifer design problem and a design problem for a large-scale groundwater model and assess their robustness properties to other optimality criteria. The results show the proof of concept is workable for finding a more informed and efficient model-based design for a water resource study.

Author(s):  
G. Panzini ◽  
E. Sciubba ◽  
A. Zoli-Porroni

This paper discusses the optimization of a 2D rotor profile attained via a novel inverse-design approach that uses the entropy generation rate as the objective function. A fundamental methodological novelty of the proposed procedure is that it does not require the generation of the fluid-dynamic fields at each iteration step of the optimisation, because the objective function is computed by a functional extrapolation based on the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) method. With this new method, the (often excessively taxing) computational cost for repeated numerical CFD simulations of incrementally different geometries is substantially decreased by reducing much of it to easy-to-perform matrix-multiplications: CFD simulations are used only to calculate the basis of the POD interpolation and to validate (i.e., extend) the results. As the accuracy of a POD expansion critically depends on the allowable number of CFD simulations, our methodology is still rather computationally intensive: but, as successfully demonstrated in the paper for an airfoil profile design problem, the idea that, given a certain number of necessary initial CFD simulations, additional full simulations are performed only in the “right direction” indicated by the gradient of the objective function in the solution space leads to a successful strategy, and substantially decreases the computational intensity of the solution. This “economy” with respect to other classical “optimization” methods is basically due to the reduction of the complete CFD simulations needed for the generation of the fluid-dynamic fields on which the objective function is calculated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document