scholarly journals Cross-Country Analysis of Corporate Governance Codes in the European Union

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleš Kubíček ◽  
Petra Štamfestová ◽  
Jiří Strouhal
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-602
Author(s):  
Vânia G. Silva ◽  
Esmeralda A. Ramalho ◽  
Carlos R. Vieira

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 600
Author(s):  
Bogdan Aurelian Mihail ◽  
Dalina Dumitrescu

This paper investigates corporate governance from a cross-country perspective and makes a comparison with Romania. There are studies that examine the corporate governance issues related to Romanian companies, but these studies provide only qualitative and descriptive accounts of the research topic, with limited cross-country analysis. The present paper complements the literature by producing a quantitative analysis of cross-country corporate governance and makes a comparison with Romania. For this purpose, a set of corporate governance indicators from a large sample of 39 advanced and developing countries was collected for the 2006–2020 period. In terms of corporate governance dimensions, it was found that Romania underperforms other developing countries in the dimensions of director liability and ownership and control, while it outperforms them in the dimensions of corporate transparency, disclosure, and shareholder rights. The results indicate that the stagnant corporate governance scores and the low development level of stock markets stand out as important business challenges for the country. The correlation and regression analyses show that stock market development is closely associated with corporate governance dimensions and, overall, corporate governance scores matter greatly for the economic growth of countries, such as Romania, which can benefit greatly from the improvement of corporate governance codes and practices in the private sector.


Author(s):  
Theodor Baums

Although corporate governance codes have spread across the European Union and beyond, and are regularly revised and adapted to changing national and international expectations of investors and other stakeholders, some important questions have not yet been unanimously answered. Two of these ongoing debates are addressed in this chapter. First, where should the line be drawn between statutory provisions and corporate governance codes as an instrument of self-regulation? Second, what is the rationale behind the idea of independent directors? In particular, how should independence be understood in relation to board members: independent of the incumbent management and company or independent of a controlling shareholder? The chapter discusses both questions using the example of the German Corporate Governance Code.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Hermes ◽  
Theo J.B.M. Postma ◽  
Orestis Zivkov

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Viviane de Beaufort

The comparative study of Corporate Governance Codes relevant to the European Union and its Member-States[1], finalised in March 2002, establishes that differences remain at a national scale on corporate governances issues. Beyond the identities of national firms in European Union lies the question: is there a European corporate governance identity? At the present time, European legislation does not cover certain essential aspects of the firm: that is where the shoe pinches! What a company is and what its aims are remain a national question; in the same time transparency requirements are established on a global dimension at least for quoted companies and some new projects of Directives and Recommendations dealing with corporate governance issues attempt to create common rules or principles. This article tries to synthesise the European action in this field and to a certain extend to criticise it not to have a more ambitious project.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document