Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Management of Colonic Polyps

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S207-S208
Author(s):  
Charles Randall ◽  
Brano Djenic ◽  
Daniela Ovadia ◽  
Carlo Taboada
2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1386-E1392
Author(s):  
Thomas Worland ◽  
Oliver Cronin ◽  
Benjamin Harrison ◽  
Linda Alexander ◽  
Nik Ding ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large sessile or laterally spreading colonic lesions is a safe alternative to surgery. We assessed reductions in Surgical Resection (SR) rates and associated clinical and financial benefits following the introduction of an EMR service to a large regional center. Patients and methods Ongoing prospective intention-to-treat analysis of EMR was undertaken from time of service inception in 2009 to 2017. Retrospective data for SR of large sessile/laterally spreading colonic lesions were collected for the period 4 years before commencement of the EMR service (2005 – 2008) and 9 years after its introduction (2009 – 2017). Results From 2005 to 2008, 32 surgical procedures were performed for non-malignant colonic neoplasia (50 % male, median age 68 years, median Length of Stay (LoS) 10 days). Following the introduction of the EMR service, there was a 56 % reduction in the number of patients referred for surgery (32 surgical procedures, 47 % male, median age 70 years, median LoS 8.5 days). During this period, EMR was successfully performed in 183 patients with 216 lesions resected (60 % male, median age 68 years, median LoS 1 day). Compared to the SR group, the EMR cohort had a lower peri-procedural complication rate (7.7 % vs 54.7 %, P < 0.0001), and shorter average LoS (1 vs 9 days, P < 0.0001). A cost saving of AUD $ 19 543.5 was seen per lesion removed with EMR compared to SR. Conclusions The introduction of a dedicated EMR service into a large regional center as an alternative to SR can lead to a substantial decrease in unnecessary surgery with subsequent clinical and financial benefits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB109-AB110
Author(s):  
Suqing Li ◽  
Jeffrey D. Mosko ◽  
Gary R. May ◽  
Gabor Kandel ◽  
Paul Kortan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Garvey ◽  
A Hadjinicolaou ◽  
M Frank ◽  
V Nadesalingam ◽  
E McDermott

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB545
Author(s):  
Kaushali Britto ◽  
Jer Fuu Ng ◽  
Ammar O. Kheir ◽  
David G. Hewett ◽  
Nicholas J. Tutticci

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhixin Zhang ◽  
Yonghong Xia ◽  
Hongyao Cui ◽  
Xin Yuan ◽  
Chunnian Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a recently developed technique and can be performed during water-aided or ordinary colonoscopy for the treatment of colorectal polyps. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR in comparison with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) of small non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Methods Patients with small size, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (4–9 mm in size) who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were enrolled in this multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups, an UEMR group and a CEMR group. Efficacy and safety were compared between groups. Results In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the complete resection rate was 83.1% (59/71) in the UEMR group and 87.3% (62/71) in the CEMR group. The en-bloc resection rate was 94.4% (67/71) in the UEMR group and 91.5% (65/71) in the CEMR group (difference 2.9%; 90% CI − 4.2 to 9.9%), showed noninferiority (noninferiority margin − 5.7% < − 4.2%). No significant difference in procedure time (81 s vs. 72 s, P = 0.183) was observed. Early bleeding was observed in 1.4% of patients in the CEMR group (1/71) and 1.4% of patients in the UEMR group (1/71). None of the patients in the UEMR group complained of postprocedural bloody stool, whereas two patients in the CEMR group (2/64) reported this adverse event. Conclusion Our results indicate that UEMR is safer and just as effective as CEMR in En-bloc resection for the treatment of small colorectal polyps as such, UEMR is recommended as an alternative approach to excising small and non-pedunculated colorectal adenomatous polyps. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov, NCT03833492. Retrospectively registered on February 7, 2019.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB150-AB151
Author(s):  
Rupert Mayershofer ◽  
Brigitte Schumacher ◽  
Michael Philipper ◽  
Horst Neuhaus

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (06) ◽  
pp. E699-E708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
Muhammad Hasan ◽  
Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy ◽  
Xiang Zhu ◽  
Robert Hawes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document