COLD SNARE PIECEMEAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION (CSP-EMR) OF LARGE SESSILE COLONIC POLYPS ≥20 MM IS FEASIBLE, SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Mangira ◽  
K Cameron ◽  
JH Koo ◽  
A Moss
2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1386-E1392
Author(s):  
Thomas Worland ◽  
Oliver Cronin ◽  
Benjamin Harrison ◽  
Linda Alexander ◽  
Nik Ding ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large sessile or laterally spreading colonic lesions is a safe alternative to surgery. We assessed reductions in Surgical Resection (SR) rates and associated clinical and financial benefits following the introduction of an EMR service to a large regional center. Patients and methods Ongoing prospective intention-to-treat analysis of EMR was undertaken from time of service inception in 2009 to 2017. Retrospective data for SR of large sessile/laterally spreading colonic lesions were collected for the period 4 years before commencement of the EMR service (2005 – 2008) and 9 years after its introduction (2009 – 2017). Results From 2005 to 2008, 32 surgical procedures were performed for non-malignant colonic neoplasia (50 % male, median age 68 years, median Length of Stay (LoS) 10 days). Following the introduction of the EMR service, there was a 56 % reduction in the number of patients referred for surgery (32 surgical procedures, 47 % male, median age 70 years, median LoS 8.5 days). During this period, EMR was successfully performed in 183 patients with 216 lesions resected (60 % male, median age 68 years, median LoS 1 day). Compared to the SR group, the EMR cohort had a lower peri-procedural complication rate (7.7 % vs 54.7 %, P < 0.0001), and shorter average LoS (1 vs 9 days, P < 0.0001). A cost saving of AUD $ 19 543.5 was seen per lesion removed with EMR compared to SR. Conclusions The introduction of a dedicated EMR service into a large regional center as an alternative to SR can lead to a substantial decrease in unnecessary surgery with subsequent clinical and financial benefits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB109-AB110
Author(s):  
Suqing Li ◽  
Jeffrey D. Mosko ◽  
Gary R. May ◽  
Gabor Kandel ◽  
Paul Kortan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Garvey ◽  
A Hadjinicolaou ◽  
M Frank ◽  
V Nadesalingam ◽  
E McDermott

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB295-AB296
Author(s):  
Gaius R. Longcroft-Wheaton ◽  
Robert Mead ◽  
Moses Duku ◽  
Pradeep Bhandari

2020 ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Shafquat Zaman ◽  
Hayaka Amada ◽  
Pratik Bhattachayra ◽  
Stephen Stonelake ◽  
Mark Goldstein ◽  
...  

Background& Objectives Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an efficient, cost-effective and minimally-invasive mode of treatment of colonic polyps. Colonic perforation post EMR is one of the potential complications associated with this procedure. Some patients may present with asymptomatic free gas on imaging and therefore not necessarily require intervention. Methods We present a case series of patients undergoing EMR who were found to have intra-abdominal free gas or ‘bowel perforation’ on imaging post procedure. They were all asymptomatic and did not warrant emergency surgical intervention. In addition, we aim to provide a review of the existing literature on ‘bowel perforation’ post EMR and discuss its management. Results & Conclusion Through this case series we highlight the importance of assessing patients clinically and not treating the radiological findings alone. Clinicians must be aware of the possibility of patients with asymptomatic free gas post EMR as a direct result of the injectate during the procedure or due to the passage of air or CO2 from the distended colon. As the popularity of this procedure increases, it is crucial that clinicians, surgeons and endoscopists are all aware of its associated complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document