Readmission of Adult Patients With Intentional Foreign Body Ingestion: A Retrospective Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S288-S289
Author(s):  
Fahad Chaudhary ◽  
Sardar Momin Shah-Khan ◽  
Hiren Vallabh ◽  
Ikenna Anaka ◽  
Justin Kupec
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilia Sapoutzi ◽  
Giorgos Sideris ◽  
Eleni Boumpa ◽  
Nikolaos Papadimitriou ◽  
Thomas Nikolopoulos ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze patterns and volumes of patients visiting ENT emergency departments during periods of community lockdowns given the newness of this situation and to assess the variation in numbers of visits and examine whether their reduction equally affects all categories of visit causation or whether it is limited to diseases not considered as emergencies.Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on prospectively collected registry data on patients of all age groups visited the emergency ENT department during the period of nationwide lockdown. Patients were grouped in 9 categories, according to the cause of visit the ENT emergency department.Results: A total of 201 patients visited the ENT emergency department. The retrospective analysis of the data during the same period in the years 2013 to 2019 showed a reduction of 73% in total visits (mean total visits number between 2013 to 2019 was 745.29 ± 20.0143). A statistically significant reduction in visitation was found in all categories studied with the exception of foreign body ingestion – aspiration.Conclusion: Patients with General ENT symptoms, mild epistaxis cases, otology cases, vertigo cases, uncomplicated infectious cases showed a statistically significant reduction in numbers and were treated empirically. Swallowing foreign body cases did not show statistically significant reduction. Limitation of movement and the lockdown itself, led to reduction of trauma cases. Surprisingly, there was also a reduction in oncology cases and an increase in numbers of these cases can be expected in the near future.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2499-2506
Author(s):  
Lili Wu ◽  
Guiyu Lei ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Zheng Wei ◽  
Yue Yin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB574
Author(s):  
Raquel Palos-Cuellar ◽  
Enrique Murcio-Pérez ◽  
Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo ◽  
Gerardo Blanco-Velasco ◽  
Omar Solorzano Pineda ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
Y. Oka ◽  
K. Asabe ◽  
H. Kai ◽  
T. Shirakusa

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-032
Author(s):  
Nisar Ahmad Shah ◽  
Showkat Ahmad Kadla ◽  
Asif Iqbal Shah ◽  
Bilal Ahmad Khan ◽  
Inaam Ul Haq ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background and Aims: Foreign-body ingestion is a common phenomenon, especially in children. In normal adults, foreign-body ingestion is usually accidental and mostly ingestion occurs with food and impaction is a result of structural abnormalities of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). However, accidental ingestion of nonfood products is unusual; especially ingestion of pins (scarf or safety pins) and needles is unknown. We come across ingestion of these unusual/sharp foreign bodies routinely from the past few years. The aim of this study was to observe, over a period of 1 year, the spectrum of nonfood or true foreign-body ingestion in our community and to see the impact of an early endoscopy on outcome or retrieval of the ingested objects. Materials and Methods: In a prospective observational study, we studied the profile of foreign-body ingestion in normal individuals of all ages and both sexes, excluding the individuals with any structural abnormalities of the gut and the people with psychiatric ailment. Results: Of total 51 patients with foreign-body ingestion, 42 (82%) were 20 or <20 years of age with females constituting 86.3% of the total and males constituting only 13.7%. Foreign bodies ingested included 38 pins (74.5%), seven coins (13.7%), four needles (7.8%), and one denture and a nail (2%) each. Overall 26 (51%) foreign bodies were seen in UGIT (within reach of retrieval) at the time of endoscopy and all of them were retrieved. Nineteen (37.3%) patients reported within 6 h of ingestion, and majority of them (16 = 84.2%) had foreign bodies within UGIT and all of them were removed. Those patients (n = 32; 62.7%) who reported beyond 6 h, only 10 (31.25%) had foreign bodies in UGIT as a result of which the success rate of removal in these patients was only 32%. Conclusion: Most of our patients were young females and the common foreign bodies ingested were sharp including scarf pins followed by coins and needles. The success rate of retrieval was high in those who reported within 6 h of ingestion of foreign body. The rate of retrieval was 100% if foreign body was found on esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Hence, we recommend an early endoscopy in these patients and some alternative to use of scarf pins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document