2835 The Impact of Patient Educational Poster in Colorectal Cancer Screening at a Resident Primary Care Clinic

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S1562-S1562
Author(s):  
Ramiro De La Guerra ◽  
Mary Lynn Sealey
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. e193403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Y. Hsiang ◽  
Shivan J. Mehta ◽  
Dylan S. Small ◽  
Charles A. L. Rareshide ◽  
Christopher K. Snider ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-571
Author(s):  
Charoen Mankongpaisarnrung ◽  
Grerk Sutamtewagul ◽  
Kunut Kijsirichareanchai ◽  
Naree Panamonta ◽  
Ariwan Rakvit ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Malhotra ◽  
Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin ◽  
Mary Elizabeth Charlton ◽  
Gary E. Rosenthal

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S188-S189
Author(s):  
Shida Haghighat ◽  
Jeffrey Yeh ◽  
Helen M. Shen ◽  
Marsha R. Cheng ◽  
Barbara Rubino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ahnnya Slaughter

Practice Problem: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States; many of the deaths are preventable with early detection. Adherence rates for colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test kits (FIT) was below the national benchmark at this facility. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this project was: Among veterans 50 – 75 years old requiring average risk colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) seen in primary care at a veterans affairs healthcare system facility (P), how does the use of a multi-component intervention (I), compared to the usual care (C), affect the number of patients completing CRCS (O) over a period of 12 weeks (T)? Evidence: Review of high-quality studies suggested a multi-component approach, including increasing provider awareness and increasing patient education and outreach, as the most effective approach to increase colorectal screening compliance. Intervention: The multi-component intervention included a standardized CRCS nurse navigation process through standard work which included the teach-back method, patient outreach, and provider feedback. Outcome: There were clinically significant improvements in adherence with returned FIT kits, follow up for abnormal FIT kits, and statistically significant improvements with nursing documentation of patient teaching. The number of patients overdue for CRCS decreased. Conclusion: The multi-component CRCS screening intervention demonstrated significant improvements in the intervention clinics which is consistent with the body of evidence.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Audrius Dulskas ◽  
Tomas Poskus ◽  
Inga Kildusiene ◽  
Ausvydas Patasius ◽  
Rokas Stulpinas ◽  
...  

We aimed to report the results of the implementation of the National Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program covering all the country. The National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) reimburses the institutions for performing each service; each procedure within the program has its own administrative code. Information about services provided within the program was retrieved from the database of NHIF starting from the 1 January 2014 to the 31 December 2018. Exact date and type of all provided services, test results, date and results of biopsy and histopathological examination were extracted together with the vital status at the end of follow-up, date of death and date of emigration when applicable for all men and women born between 1935 and 1968. Results were compared with the guidelines of the European Union for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis. The screening uptake was 49.5% (754,061 patients) during study period. Participation rate varied from 16% to 18.1% per year and was higher among women than among men. Proportion of test-positive and test-negative results was similar during all the study period—8.7% and 91.3% annually. Between 9.2% and 13.5% of test-positive patients received a biopsy of which 52.3–61.8% were positive for colorectal adenoma and 4.6–7.3% for colorectal carcinoma. CRC detection rate among test-positive individuals varied between 0.93% and 1.28%. The colorectal cancer screening program in Lithuania coverage must be improved. A screening database is needed to systematically evaluate the impact and performance of the national CRC screening program and quality assurance within the program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document