scholarly journals S510 Time to Relief of Key Abdominal and Bowel Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Linaclotide

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S228-S228
Author(s):  
Darren M. Brenner ◽  
Brian E. Lacy ◽  
Alexander C. Ford ◽  
Wilmin Bartolini ◽  
James Wu ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Altayar ◽  
Varun Sharma ◽  
Larry J. Prokop ◽  
Amit Sood ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Murad

Background. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a poorly understood disease with few effective treatments. Psychosocial factors are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of IBS.Objective. To evaluate the evidence for psychological therapies in IBS treatment.Methods. We searched six medical databases through February 6, 2014, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological therapies for the treatment of IBS. Two independent reviewers identified the RCTs, extracted the data, and assessed trial quality. We used the random-effect model to pool standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) across trials.Results. 15 RCTs that mostly evaluated cognitive behavioral therapy were included. Psychological therapies were associated with improvement in IBS symptoms severity scales (SMD −0.618; 95% CI: −0.853 to −0.383), IBS-Quality of Life (SMD 0.604; 95% CI: 0.440 to 0.768), and abdominal pain (SMD −0.282; 95% CI: −0.562 to −0.001). No statistically significant effect was observed on diarrhea or constipation.Limitations. The trials were at increased risk of bias and the overall sample size was small leading to imprecision.Conclusion. Psychological therapies may improve the quality of life and symptom severity in IBS. The effect size noted is moderate to large and is clinically meaningful.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255665
Author(s):  
Yun-bo Wu ◽  
Yun-kai Dai ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Huai-geng Pan ◽  
Wei-jing Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction Plenty of clinical studies have suggested the value of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but their efficacy and safety have not been systematically concluded yet. This article aimed to compare and rank the therapeutic effect and safety of CHM with routine pharmacotherapies and placebo in the treatment of IBS. Methods Randomized controlled trials regarding CHM to treat IBS were searched in six databases from inception to Jan 31, 2020. A network meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the data of included publications. The quality assessment was assessed by Cochrane Handbook and GRADEpro software. The risk ratio was calculated for dichotomous outcomes while the standardized mean difference was used for continuous variables with 95% credible intervals. A Funnel plot was performed to evaluate publication bias. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was conducted to rank the included interventions. Data were analyzed with STATA 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3. Result 3194 records were searched, and 28 eligible trials involving 3323 patients ere identified. Compared with conventional therapies and placebo, Jianpi-Chushi therapy showed significant improvement in adequate relief and IBS symptom severity scale; Shugan-Jianpi therapy showed the best efficacy in relieving the abdominal pain and abdominal distension; Wenshen-Jianpi therapy had a better effect on avoiding adverse effects and improving stool character. Conclusion This study confirmed that CHM could be beneficial for patients with IBS in relieving their clinical symptoms and should be recommended as alternative therapies. The quality of evidence in this study based on the GRADE system was “low”.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document