scholarly journals Intrasplenic Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Rare Complication of Acute Pancreatitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirsh Trivedi ◽  
Asim Shuja ◽  
Bhavesh B. Shah
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S722-S722
Author(s):  
Jasparit Minhas ◽  
Srilaxmi Gujjula ◽  
Eric O. Then ◽  
Praneeth Bandaru ◽  
Madhavi Reddy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Peter J. Edmonds ◽  
Juan Pablo Arroyo ◽  
Andre Morales ◽  
Ryan M. Brown ◽  
Wesley E. Ely

.


2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Skipworth ◽  
D Raptis ◽  
D Brennand ◽  
C Imber ◽  
A Shankar

We present the case of a 45-year-old man, who presented to his local casualty department with severe epigastric pain following an alcohol binge, and was subsequently diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis with multiple collections ensued, necessitating transfer to an intensive care unit (ITU) in a tertiary hepatopancreaticobiliary centre. Initially, the patient appeared to slowly improve and was discharged to the ward, albeit following a prolonged ITU admission. However, during his subsequent recovery, he suffered multiple episodes of haematemesis and melaena associated with haemodynamic instability and requiring repeat admission to the ITU. Computerised tomographic angiography, followed by visceral angiography, was used to confirm the diagnosis of multisite visceral artery pseudoaneurysms, secondary to severe, necrotising pancreatitis. Pseudoaneurysms of the splenic, left colic and gastroduodenal arteries were sequentially, and successfully, radiologically embolised over a period of 9 days. Subsequent sequelae of radiological embolisation included a clinically insignificant splenic infarct, and a left colonic infarction associated with subsequent enterocutaneous fistula formation. The patient made a prolonged, but successful, recovery and was discharged from hospital after 260 days as an in-patient. This case illustrates the rare complication of three separate pseudoaneurysms, secondary to acute pancreatitis, successfully managed radiologically in the same patient. This case also highlights the necessity for multidisciplinary involvement in the management of pseudoaneurysms, an approach that is often most successfully achieved in a tertiary setting.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Deniel ◽  
Thierry Coton ◽  
Sarah Brardjanian ◽  
Michel Guisset ◽  
Elisabeth Nicand ◽  
...  

Digestion ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Daxin Guo ◽  
Wei Dai ◽  
Jingyi Shen ◽  
Mengting Zhang ◽  
Yetan Shi ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains a debatable issue. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This meta-analysis of prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics for SAP was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to February 2021. The related bibliographies were manually searched. The primary outcomes involved infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis, mortality, complications, infections, and organ failure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seven articles comprised 5 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective observational studies, including 3,864 SAP participants. Prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of infections (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27; <i>p</i> = 0.03) and complications (OR: 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.009). Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the incidence of infected pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis (OR: 0.74; <i>p</i> = 0.24), mortality (OR: 0.69; <i>p</i> = 0.17), extrapancreatic infection (OR: 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.54), pulmonary infection (OR: 1.23; <i>p</i> = 0.69), blood infection (OR: 0.60; <i>p</i> = 0.35), urinary tract infection (OR: 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.97), pancreatic pseudocyst (OR: 0.59; <i>p</i> = 0.28), fluid collection (OR: 0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.76), organ failure (OR: 0.63; <i>p</i> = 0.19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR: 0.80; <i>p</i> = 0.61), surgical intervention (OR: 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.93), dialysis (OR: 2.34; <i>p</i> = 0.57), use of respirator or ventilator (OR: 1.90; <i>p</i> = 0.40), intensive care unit treatment (OR: 2.97; <i>p</i> = 0.18), and additional antibiotics (OR: 0.59; <i>p</i> = 0.28) between the experimental and control groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> It is not recommended to administer routine prophylactic carbapenem antibiotics in SAP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document