scholarly journals Carbon Ion Dose Constraints in the Head and Neck and Skull Base: Review of MedAustron Institutional Protocols

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Piero Fossati ◽  
Ana Perpar ◽  
Markus Stock ◽  
Petra Georg ◽  
Antonio Carlino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dose constraints are of paramount importance for the outcome of any radiotherapy treatment. In this article, we report dose-volume constraints as well as currently used fractionation schedules for carbon ion radiotherapy as applied in MedAustron (Wiener Neustadt, Austria). Materials and Methods For fractionation schedules, both German and Japanese regimes were used. From the clinical experience of National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Chiba, Japan) and Heidelberg Ion Therapy (Heidelberg, Germany; formerly GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany) and the work by colleagues in Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica (Pavia, Italy) recalculating the dose from the microdosimetric kinetic model to the local effect model, we have set the dose constraints for critical organs of the head and neck area. Where no clinical data was available, an educated guess was made, based on data available from photon and proton series. Results We report the constraints for the optic nerve and chiasm, brainstem, spinal cord, cochlea, brain parenchyma, salivary gland, eye and adnexa, and mandibular/maxillary bone; constraints are grouped based on a fractionation scheme (German versus Japanese) and the risk of toxicity (safe, low to middle, and middle to high). Conclusion We think validation of dose constraints should present a relevant part of the activity of any carbon ion radiotherapy facility, and we anticipate future multicentric, joint evaluations.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Jiyi Hu ◽  
Jiade Lu ◽  
Lin Kong

Abstract Background: We sought to establish a conversion curve to convert the RBE-weighted doses calculated by local effect model I (LEM) (LEM RBE-weighted doses) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) to the RBE-weighted doses calculated by microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) (MKM RBE-weighted doses). We also converted the LEM dose constraints (RBE-weighted dose constraints in LEM plans) for the brain stem, spinal cord, and optic nerve based on this curve.Methods: Data from 20 patients with rNPC receiving carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in our hospital were collected. LEM in Raystation (V8A, Raystation, Sweden) was used to generate treatment plans. The clinical target volume CTV1(GTV+5mm)was given 3 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Ninety-nine percent of target volumes should be covered by 95% of the prescriptions; the maximum doses of the brainstem and spinal cord were < 45 Gy (RBE) and < 30 Gy (RBE), respectively. The doses covering 20% volumes of optical nerves/chiasms D20 were < 30 Gy (RBE). Then physical doses of the LEM plans were recalculated by using MKM in Raystation to generate MKM plans. A series of conversion factors (i.e., the ratio of LEM RBE-weighted dose to MKM RBE-weighted dose) was then obtained by using an isovolumetric dose method. The LEM plan prescriptions (LEM prescription) and dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) (OAR constraints) were converted to the corresponding MKM prescriptions and dose constraints using this conversion curve. Results: For the CTV1 fractional RBE-weighted dose prescription of 3.00 Gy (RBE) and CTV2 of 2.70 Gy (RBE) in LEM plans, the conversion factors (LEM RBE-weighted dose/MKM RBE-weighted dose) were 1.37 (CI 95% 1.35–1.39) and 1.46 (1.41–1.51), respectively. The average conversion factors from 1.37(CI 95% 1.33–1.41) to 3.09 (2.94–3.24) corresponded to the LEM fractionated doses from 2.86 Gy (RBE) to 0.24 Gy (RBE), including the doses constraining upon OARs. LEM RBE-weighted doses of 30 Gy (RBE) and 45 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions were converted to MKM RBE-weighted doses of 16.64 Gy (RBE) and 30.72 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. Conclusions: This conversion curve could be used to convert LEM RBE-weighted doses to MKM RBE-weighted doses for patients with rNPC receiving CIRT, providing dose references for re-irradiation therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Jiyi Hu ◽  
Jiade Lu ◽  
Lin Kong

Abstract Background We sought to establish a conversion curve to convert the RBE-weighted doses calculated by local effect model I (LEM) (LEM RBE-weighted doses) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) to the RBE-weighted doses calculated by microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) (MKM RBE-weighted doses). We also converted the LEM dose constraints (RBE-weighted dose constraints in LEM plans) for the brain stem, spinal cord, and optic nerve based on this curve. Methods Data from 20 patients with rNPC receiving carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in our hospital were collected. LEM in Raystation (V8A, Raystation, Sweden) was used to generate treatment plans. The clinical target volume CTV1 (GTV + 5 mm) was given 3 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Ninety-nine percent of target volumes should be covered by 95% of the prescriptions; the maximum doses of the brainstem and spinal cord were < 45 Gy (RBE) and < 30 Gy (RBE), respectively. The doses covering 20% volumes of optical nerves/chiasms D20 were < 30 Gy (RBE). Then physical doses of the LEM plans were recalculated by using MKM in Raystation to generate MKM plans. A series of conversion factors (i.e., the ratio of LEM RBE-weighted dose to MKM RBE-weighted dose) was then obtained by using an isovolumetric dose method. The LEM plan prescriptions (LEM prescription) and dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) (OAR constraints) were converted to the corresponding MKM prescriptions and dose constraints using this conversion curve. Results For the CTV1 fractional RBE-weighted dose prescription of 3.00 Gy (RBE) and CTV2 of 2.70 Gy (RBE) in LEM plans, the conversion factors (LEM RBE-weighted dose/MKM RBE-weighted dose) were 1.37 (CI 95% 1.35–1.39) and 1.46 (1.41–1.51), respectively. The average conversion factors from 1.37 (CI 95% 1.33–1.41) to 3.09 (2.94–3.24) corresponded to the LEM fractionated doses from 2.86 Gy (RBE) to 0.24 Gy (RBE), including the doses constraining upon OARs. LEM RBE-weighted doses of 30 Gy (RBE) and 45 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions were converted to MKM RBE-weighted doses of 16.64 Gy (RBE) and 30.72 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. Conclusions This conversion curve could be used to convert LEM RBE-weighted doses to MKM RBE-weighted doses for patients with rNPC receiving CIRT, providing dose references for re-irradiation therapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Jiyi Hu ◽  
Jiade Lu ◽  
Lin Kong

Abstract Background We sought to establish a conversion curve to convert the RBE-weighted doses calculated by local effect model I (LEM) (LEM RBE-weighted doses) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) to the RBE-weighted doses calculated by microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) (MKM RBE-weighted doses). We also converted the LEM dose constraints (RBE-weighted dose constraints in LEM plans) for the brain stem, spinal cord, and optic nerve based on this curve. Methods Data from 20 patients with rNPC receiving carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in our hospital were collected. LEM in Raystation (V8A, Raystation, Sweden) was used to generate treatment plans. The clinical target volume CTV1(GTV+5mm)was given 3 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Ninety-nine percent of target volumes should be covered by 95% of the prescriptions; the maximum doses of the brainstem and spinal cord were < 45 Gy (RBE) and < 30 Gy (RBE), respectively. The doses covering 20% volumes of optical nerves/chiasms D20 were < 30 Gy (RBE). Then physical doses of the LEM plans were recalculated by using MKM in Raystation to generate MKM plans. A series of conversion factors (i.e., the ratio of LEM RBE-weighted dose to MKM RBE-weighted dose) was then obtained by using an isovolumetric dose method. The LEM plan prescriptions (LEM prescription) and dose constraints of the organs at risk (OARs) (OAR constraints) were converted to the corresponding MKM prescriptions and dose constraints using this conversion curve. Results For the CTV1 fractional RBE-weighted dose prescription of 3.00 Gy (RBE) and CTV2 of 2.70 Gy (RBE) in LEM plans, the conversion factors (LEM RBE-weighted dose/MKM RBE-weighted dose) were 1.37 (CI 95% 1.35–1.39) and 1.46 (1.41–1.51), respectively. The average conversion factors from 1.37(CI 95% 1.33–1.41) to 3.09 (2.94–3.24) corresponded to the LEM fractionated doses from 2.86 Gy (RBE) to 0.24 Gy (RBE), including the doses constraining upon OARs. LEM RBE-weighted doses of 30 Gy (RBE) and 45 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions were converted to MKM RBE-weighted doses of 16.64 Gy (RBE) and 30.72 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. Conclusions This conversion curve could be used to convert LEM RBE-weighted doses to MKM RBE-weighted doses for patients with rNPC receiving CIRT, providing dose references for re-irradiation therapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Jiyi Hu ◽  
Jiade Lu ◽  
Lin Kong

Abstract Background We sought to establish a conversion curve to convert the local effect model I (LEM) based RBE-weighted doses (LEM doses) in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) to the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) based RBE-weighted dose (MKM doses) model. We also converted the relevant organ at risk (OAR) constraints based on this curve. Methods Data from 13 patients with rNPC receiving carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in our hospital were collected. LEM in Raystation (V8A, Raystation, Sweden) was used to generate treatment plans. Clinical target volume CTV1(GTV+5mm)was given 63 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions. Ninety-nine percent of target volumes should be covered by 95% of the prescriptions; the maximum doses of the brainstem and spinal cord were < 45 Gy (RBE) and < 30 Gy (RBE), respectively. The doses covering 20% volumes of optical nerves/chiasms D20 were < 30 Gy (RBE). Then physical doses of the LEM plans were recalculated by using MKM in Raystation to generate MKM plans. A series of the ratio of LEM dose to MKM dose was obtained as the conversion factor to obtain the conversion curve by using an isovolumetric dose method. Using prescriptions and OAR, constraints were converted to MKM doses with this curve. Results Conversion factors (LEM dose/MKM dose) from 1.37±0.02 to 3.09±0.09 corresponded to the LEM fractionated doses from 0.24 Gy (RBE) to 2.86 Gy (RBE), including the doses constraining upon OARs. LEM doses of 30 Gy (RBE) and 45 Gy (RBE) in 21 fractions were converted to MKM doses of 16.64 Gy (RBE) and 30.98 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions. Conclusions This conversion curve could be used to convert LEM doses to MKM doses for patients with rNPC receiving CIRT, providing dose references for re-irradiation therapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Yinxiangzi Sheng ◽  
Zhijie Huang ◽  
Jingfang Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The study objective was to convert the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) rectum constraints for 16-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) to local effect model (LEM) constraints for 12-fraction, 8-fraction, and 4-fraction CIRT for prostate carcinoma patients (PCAs).Methods: Two strategies were employed. To understand the fractionation effects, MKM linear-quadric (LQ) strategy first converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to 12-fraction, 8-fraction, and 4-fraction CIRT. To examine the differences in the biophysical models, MKM constraints were converted to LEM constraints using an RBE-conversion model. The LEM LQ strategy first converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to LEM constraints using the RBE-conversion model. Then, the LEM constraints converted the 16-fraction constraints to the rectum constraints for 12-fraction, 8-fraction, and 4-fraction CIRT using the LQ model. The LEM rectum constraints for 16 and 12-fraction CIRTs were compared to the rectum doses and the clinical follow-ups in 40 patients.Results: The 16-fraction NIRS rectum constraint Dmax < 60.8 Gy(RBE) and CNAO rectum constraint D1cc < 66.00 Gy(RBE) were converted by MKM LQ strategy to LEM constraints 58.01 and 55.97 Gy(RBE) (12fx), 45.47 and 43.97 Gy(RBE) (8fx), and 29.64 and 28.67 Gy(RBE) (4fx) and by LEM LQ strategy to 61.73 and 59.69 Gy(RBE) (12fx), 53.03 and 51.33 Gy(RBE) (8fx), and 40.10 and 38.88 Gy(RBE) (4fx). Differences of 36.13% were found. No late rectum complications were reported.Conclusions: The LEM rectum constraints from MKM LQ strategy were more conservative and can be used as the reference constraints for starting the hypofractionated CIRT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Yinxiangzi Sheng ◽  
Zhijie Huang ◽  
Jingfang Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The study objective was to establish the local effect model (LEM) rectum constraints for 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in patients with localized prostate carcinoma (PCA) using microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM)-defined and LEM-defined constraints for 16-fraction CIRT. Methods We analyzed 40 patients with PCA who received 16- or 12-fraction CIRT at our center. Linear-quadratic (LQ) and RBE-conversion models were employed to convert the constraints into various fractionations and biophysical models. Based on them, the MKM LQ strategy converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction CIRT using the LQ model. Then, MKM constraints were converted to LEM using the RBE-conversion model. Meanwhile the LEM LQ strategy converted MKM rectum constraints for 16-fraction CIRT to LEM using the RBE-conversion model. Then, LEM constraints were converted from 16-fraction constraints to the rectum constraints for 12-, 8-, and 4-fraction CIRT using the LQ model. The LEM constraints for 16- and 12-fraction CIRT were evaluated using rectum doses and clinical follow-up. To adapt them for the MKM LQ strategy, CNAO LEM constraints were first converted to MKM constraints using the RBE-conversion model. Results The NIRS (i.e. DMKM|v, V-20%, 10%, 5%, and 0%) and CNAO rectum constraints (i.e. DLEM|v, V-10 cc, 5 cc, and 1 cc) were converted for 12-fraction CIRT using the MKM LQ strategy to LEM 37.60, 49.74, 55.27, and 58.01 Gy (RBE), and 45.97, 51.70, and 55.97 Gy (RBE), and using the LEM LQ strategy to 39.55, 53.08, 58.91, and 61.73 Gy (RBE), and 49.14, 55.30, and 59.69 Gy (RBE). We also established LEM constraints for 8- and 4-fraction CIRT. The 10-patient RBE-conversion model was comparable to 30-patient model. Eight patients who received 16-fraction CIRT exceeded the corresponding rectum constraints; the others were within the constraints. After a median follow-up of 10.8 months (7.1–20.8), No ≥ G1 late rectum toxicities were observed. Conclusions The LEM rectum constraints from the MKM LQ strategy were more conservative and might serve as the reference for hypofractionated CIRT. However, Long-term follow-up plus additional patients is necessary.


2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Shirai ◽  
Kyohei Fukata ◽  
Akiko Adachi ◽  
Jun-ichi Saitoh ◽  
Atsushi Musha ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (15) ◽  
pp. 4273-4289 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mairani ◽  
S Brons ◽  
F Cerutti ◽  
A Fassò ◽  
A Ferrari ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S659
Author(s):  
M. Bonora ◽  
B. Vischioni ◽  
D. Caivano ◽  
A. Hasegawa ◽  
V. Vitolo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document