scholarly journals Getting Started in Academic Primary Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
Kenya Ie
Author(s):  
Ingrid L. Tablazon ◽  
Deepak Palakshappa ◽  
Faith C OBrian ◽  
Brenda Ramirez ◽  
Joseph A. Skelton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dane A. Snyder ◽  
Jonathon Schuller ◽  
Zeenath Ameen ◽  
Christina Toth ◽  
Alex R. Kemper

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. e90-e100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra F. Dalton ◽  
Corey Lyon ◽  
Bennett Parnes ◽  
Douglas Fernald ◽  
Carmen L. Lewis

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario M. Torre ◽  
Scott M. Wright ◽  
Renée F. Wilson ◽  
Marie Diener-West ◽  
Eric B. Bass

2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-530
Author(s):  
Carrie N. Vogler ◽  
Stacy Sattovia ◽  
Laura Y. Salazar ◽  
Tiffany I. Leung ◽  
Albert Botchway

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e000986
Author(s):  
Cynthia Cantu ◽  
Kristopher Koch ◽  
Ramon S Cancino

IntroductionMore payers are closely linking reimbursement to high-value care outcomes such as immunisation rates. Despite this, there remain high rates of pneumonia and influenza-related hospitalisations generating hospital expenditures as high as $11 000 per hospitalisation. Vaccinating the public is an integral part of preventing poor health and utilisation outcomes and is particularly relevant to high-risk patients. As part of a multidisciplinary effort between family and internal medicine residency programmes, our goal was to improve vaccination rates to an average of 76% of eligible Medicaid, low-income and uninsured (MLIU) patients at an academic primary care practice.MethodsThe quality improvement project was completed over 3 months by three primary care resident groups. The setting was a suburban academic primary care practice and eligible patients were 18 years of age or older. Our aim was to increase immunisation rates of pneumococcal, influenza, varicella, herpes zoster virus and tetanus and diphtheria vaccination. There were 1690 patients eligible for the vaccination composite metric. Data were derived from the electronic health record and administrative data.InterventionsCohort 1 developed an initial intervention that consisted of a vaccine questionnaire for patients to complete while in the waiting room. Cohort 2 modified questionnaire after reviewing results from initial intervention. Cohort 3 recommended elimination of questionnaire and implementation of a bundled intervention approach.ResultsThere were minimal improvements in patient immunisation rates after using a patient-directed paper questionnaire. After implementation of multiple interventions via an improvement bundle, there were improvements in immunisation rates which were sustained and the result of special cause variation.ConclusionA key to improving immunisation rates for MLIU patients in this clinic was developing relationships with faculty and staff stakeholders. We received feedback from all the medical staff and then applied it to the interventions and made an impact in the average of vaccinations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document