Calculation of Tool Life of a Single Point Cutting Tool under Different Metallic Coatings

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Chandra Mouli Anumula ◽  
Kiran Datta Talluri ◽  
Vikram Sinha ◽  
Annamareddy Srinadh
Author(s):  
Thawhid Khan ◽  
Matthew Broderick ◽  
Syed Ashir Sajid ◽  
Jack Secker ◽  
Chris M Taylor

Metalworking fluids (MWFs) can greatly improve the machinability of materials and increase cutting tool life. There are a range of MWF products available on the market, however there are very few reliable low cost machining based fluid screening tests which can help select the most suitable candidate. This study developed a novel and rigorous single point milling (SPM) procedure carried out under controlled conditions, which would provide fluid performance differentiation for a range of typical aerospace alloys. The use of a single insert with a controlled geometry reduced machining variance and ensured performance repeatability. Tool life curves were used to determine optimum machining surface speeds for Inconel 718 (In718) of 80 m/min and Ti-6Al-4V (Ti64) of 160 m/min. Carrying out trials using five different cutting fluid products within a controlled tool life window clearly demonstrated that the SPM machining test was able to differentiate performance on both In718 and Ti64 material. Overall a 65% and 53% performance difference in tool life behaviour was observed between the best and worst performing fluids for In718 and Ti64, respectively.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1706 ◽  
pp. 012186
Author(s):  
Anirudh Kohli ◽  
Vrishabh Ghalagi ◽  
Manoj Divate ◽  
Chetan manakatti ◽  
Md. Irshad Karigar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 862 ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Samardžiová

There is a difference in machining by the cutting tool with defined geometry and undefined geometry. That is one of the reasons of implementation of hard turning into the machining process. In current manufacturing processes is hard turning many times used as a fine finish operation. It has many advantages – machining by single point cutting tool, high productivity, flexibility, ability to produce parts with complex shapes at one clamping. Very important is to solve machined surface quality. There is a possibility to use wiper geometry in hard turning process to achieve 3 – 4 times lower surface roughness values. Cutting parameters influence cutting process as well as cutting tool geometry. It is necessary to take into consideration cutting force components as well. Issue of the use of wiper geometry has been still insufficiently researched.


Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 274-277
Author(s):  
Alexey Vereschaka ◽  
Marina Volosova ◽  
Nikolay Sitnikov ◽  
Filipp Milovich ◽  
Nikolay Andreev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document