Safety testing of cell-based medicinal products: Opportunities for the monocyte activation test for pyrogens

ALTEX ◽  
2007 ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Montag
Vaccine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (29) ◽  
pp. 3761-3769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Studholme ◽  
Janet Sutherland ◽  
Trusha Desai ◽  
Jason Hockley ◽  
Rory Care ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1375
Author(s):  
Danielle Carson ◽  
Sophie Myhill ◽  
Elena Palmieri ◽  
Francesca Necchi ◽  
Sjoerd Rijpkema ◽  
...  

Generalised modules for membrane antigens (GMMA)-based vaccines comprise the outer membrane from genetically modified Gram-negative bacteria containing membrane proteins, phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides. Some lipoproteins and lipopolysaccharides are pyrogens; thus, GMMA-based vaccines are intrinsically pyrogenic. It is important to control the pyrogenic content of biological medicines, including vaccines, to prevent adverse reactions such as febrile responses. The rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) and bacterial endotoxin test (BET) are the most commonly employed safety assays used to detect pyrogens. However, both tests are tailored for detecting pyrogenic contaminants and have considerable limitations when measuring the pyrogen content of inherently pyrogenic products. We report the adaptation of the monocyte activation test (MAT) as an alternative to the RPT for monitoring the pyrogenicity of Shigella GMMA-based vaccines. The European Pharmacopoeia endorses three MAT methods (A–C). Of these, method C, the reference lot comparison test, was identified as the most suitable. This method was evaluated with different reference materials to ensure parallelism and consistency for a mono- and multi-component Shigella GMMA vaccine. We demonstrate the drug substance as a promising reference material for safety testing of the matched drug product. Our results support the implementation of MAT as an alternative to the RPT and use of the defined parameters can be extended to GMMA-based vaccines currently in development, aiding vaccine batch release.


Vaccine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (29) ◽  
pp. 3747-3753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Vipond ◽  
Janet Sutherland ◽  
Karin Nordgren ◽  
George Kemp ◽  
Alan Heath ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabela Gimenes ◽  
Cristiane Caldeira ◽  
Octavio Augusto França Presgrave ◽  
Wlamir Correa de Moura ◽  
Maria Helena Simões Villas Boas

Author(s):  
Carla Lilian de Agostini Utescher ◽  
Klariane Laís Buosi ◽  
Viviane Fungaro Botosso ◽  
Wagner Quintilio

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Sensebé ◽  
Sandrine Fleury-Cappellesso

Due to their multi/pluripotency and immunosuppressive properties, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are important tools for treatment of immune disorders and tissue repair. The increasing uses of MSCs lead to the development of production processes that need to be in accordance with good manufacturing practices (GMP). In Europe, MSCs are somatic cell-therapy products, referred to as advanced-therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), and in the United States MSCs must comply with current good tissue practice requirements. The safety and efficacy of MSCs must be ensured, whatever the cell source, and studies of dose and biodistribution are important aspects of safety testing. Preclinical data on biodistribution and pharmacodynamics are mandatory for approval. It is important to demonstrate that MSCs do not have unwanted homing that could drive to inappropriate differentiation in some organ or to support cancer development as suggested in some experiments. All these aspects should be addressed in a risk-based approach according to recently published guidelines by EMA. In the present article, we summarize the main approaches for labeling and tracking of infused MSCs, report on current animal models, and give an overview of available results on biodistribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document