scholarly journals Solitary Cecal Diverticulitis Mimicking Acute Appendicitis in A Child: Intraoperative Diagnosis

Author(s):  
Asudan Tugce Bozkurter Cil
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleyman Kalcan ◽  
Fatih Basak ◽  
Mustafa Hasbahceci ◽  
Ali Kilic ◽  
Tolga Canbak ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin T. Huntington ◽  
William Brigode ◽  
Rajan K. Thakkar ◽  
Mehul V. Raval ◽  
Steven Teich

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 294
Author(s):  
Nuno Goncalves ◽  
Jose Pedro Pinto ◽  
Ricardo Pereira ◽  
Joaquim Costa Pereira

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguzhan Karatepe ◽  
Osman Gulcicek ◽  
Gokhan Adas ◽  
Muharrem Battal ◽  
Yasar Ozdenkaya ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
P.S. Rusak ◽  
◽  
О.К. Tolstanov ◽  
V.F. Rybalchenko ◽  
V.V. Stakhov ◽  
...  

Objective: to analyze the results of treatment of children with acute appendicitis and improve the algorithm of care. Materials and methods. The study is based on the results of treatment of 269 children with acute appendicitis and its complications, who were treated in the period 2019-2020; the microbiological part of the work was analyzed on 2334 bacteriological cultures in patients with HA in the period 1997-2019; 239 pathohistological examinations of removed appendages in the period 2019-2020. Results. The groups had different appendectomy techniques: 122 children underwent laparoscopic surgery, 147 children underwent laparotomy. In the group of children who underwent laparoscopic surgery in the structure of diagnoses: acute phlegmonous appendicitis – 51 (41.8%) children; primary peritonitis – 28 (22.9%) children; acute gangrenous-perforated appendicitis, abscess, purulent peritonitis – 24 (19.7%) children, acute gangrenous appendicitis – 16 (13.1%) children, catarrhal – 3 (2.5%) children. In 21 (17.2%) cases there was a conversion: the main reason for which was the lack of visualization of the tailbone, which led the surgeon to switch to laparotomy. Visualization of pathological changes during the ultrasound examination of the abdominal cavity occurred in 27 (31.4%) cases out of 86 performed. Intraoperative diagnosis and histopathological conclusion coincided in 65 (69%) cases. Of these: 74.5% with phlegmonous appendicitis; 68.5% with gangrenous appendicitis; 67% with gangrenous-perforated appendicitis, abscess, purulent peritonitis. In the group of children operated laparotomically in the structure of diagnoses: acute phlegmonous appendicitis – 60 (40.8%) children; acute gangrenous appendicitis – 66 (38%) children; gangrenous-perforative appendicitis, abscess, purulent peritonitis – 26 (17.7%) children. In 35 (44.3%) cases out of 79 in the preoperative ultrasound examination of the abdominal cavity, the tail was not visualized. Intraoperative diagnosis and histopathological conclusion coincided in 115 (78.2%) cases with 147. Comparing the results of treatment of both groups of children, it should be noted that in the group of children operated laparoscopically in 68.4% of cases during the ultrasound examination visualization of the tailbone was impossible. Due to the atypical location of the appendix in 17.2% of cases, which was not visualized during laparoscopy, conversion was performed. In the group of children operated laparotomically in 44.3% of cases, the tail, during the ultrasound examination, was not visualized due to the presence of destructive changes and complications in the abdominal cavity. Conclusions. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with an atypical location and the presence of anatomical abnormalities can be complicated and affect the choice of treatment, requires a full arsenal of diagnostic capabilities of the clinic. When performing laparoscopic surgery, it is necessary to control its duration, pressure in the abdominal cavity, to conduct visual inspection of the abdominal cavity, to determine the feasibility and timeliness of conversion, which ultimately affects the safety of the patient. According to our studies, in 43% of cases of examined children in the preoperative period, the appendix was not visualized sonographically, during diagnostic laparoscopy in 11.5% (according to our studies) failed to visualize the tailbone, which required the surgeon to convert. According to the research results, the sensitivity of the Alvarado scale was 89.8%, and the specificity was 75.9%, which indicates the expediency and necessity of using the scale when examining children with suspected acute appendicitis. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. Key words: children, appendicitis, acute appendicitis, laparoscopy, laparotomy.


Purpose: The resection of a normal-looking appendix during laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) remains a dilemma. The optimal approach requires reliable macroscopic judgment by the surgeons. The aim of this study is to assess the surgeon’s ability to laparoscopically diagnose acute appendicitis (AA) in its initial uncomplicated grades. Method: Subgroup analysis from the POSAW study, 2016. Patients diagnosed with initial grades of AA (0 – 1) who underwent LA were included (n=718). The median age was 29.4 years, and 52% were female. The accuracy of the macroscopic intraoperative diagnosis was assessed with the histopathological examination of the resected specimens, and the agreement between the surgeon’s and the pathologist’s judgment was established. Results: Of the 79 appendices classified intraoperatively as normal-looking, 18 (22.8%) had some inflammation degree. Of the 639 appendices classified intraoperatively as inflamed, 101 (15.8%) were normal. The intraoperative surgeon’s judgment had an accuracy of 83.4% and a moderate to low agreement (Kappa 0.42). The sensitivity and specificity values were 96.8% and 37.7%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 84.2% and 77.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The surgeon’s intraoperative diagnosis of uncomplicated AA’s initial grades is not sufficiently accurate to establish good reliability for appendicectomy. The surgeon overestimates the presence of appendicular inflammation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 986
Author(s):  
Won Ku Choi ◽  
Yun Kyung Song ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Chul Hee Rheu ◽  
Young Ju Jeong ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Mudatsakis ◽  
Marinos Nikolaou ◽  
Konstantinos Krithinakis ◽  
Michail Matalliotakis ◽  
Nikolaos Politis ◽  
...  

Solitary cecal diverticulitis is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain in the Western world. Its clinical presentation, in most cases, mimics acute appendicitis. A 38-year-old Caucasian man presented with acute abdomen and clinical signs of acute appendicitis. Laparotomy was performed and revealed an inflammatory, solitary diverticulum of the cecum. A typical appendectomy was performed and a catheter was inserted for draining percutaneously the inflamed diverticulum of the cecum. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. This frequently misdiagnosed condition, in most cases, is being suspected and identified intraoperatively as acute appendicitis. The aim of this study is to review the available different surgical management options and to present an alternative therapeutic approach that may be valuable under specific circumstances.


Author(s):  
Rovena Bode ◽  
Eriol Braholli ◽  
Asfloral Haxhiu ◽  
Xheladin Draçini ◽  
Etmont Çeliku

Background: Caecal diverticulitis is an unusual condition that presents clinically similar to appendicitis. The diagnosis is not always easy and in the majority of cases, it is usually made at laparotomy. The aim of the present study is to retrospectively report our personal experience with solitary caecal diverticulitis, to determine its incidence in patients presenting as an acute abdomen, as well as identify the symptoms and clinical features that may aid in making a pre-operative diagnosis. And to compare this with a review of the literature, focusing on the surgical treatment and also on the indication of appendectomy in the presence of caecal diverticulitis not requiring surgery. Materials and methods: Data was collected in patients hospitalized for acute appendicitis or acute abdomen, in the surgical emergency unit of University Hospital Center "Mother Teresa" of Tirana, in a period of 3 years (2015-2017). Sex, age, duration of symptoms, preoperative diagnosis, management, intraoperative findings, histologic examination, length of hospital stay and complications of allpatients affected by solitary caecal diverticulitis were reviewed. Results: In the study period, 15 patients presented with a solitary caecal diverticulitis. Most of patients had pain in the right iliac fossa, with a duration of 2–6 days. All patients presented with abdominal pain, additional symptoms were nausea, vomiting and fever. The mean white blood cell count was from 8500-19.200/mm3, while the remaining laboratory results were normal. There were no specific findings on abdominal X-ray or ultrasonography. Intraoperative findings ranged from localized /circumscript peritonitis to generalised peritonitis due to acute diverticulitis and a normal appendix. Surgery ranged from diverticulum resection accompanied to appendectomy, to ileocaecal resection, and right hemicolectomy. Conclusions: Cecal diverticulitis should be included in the differen­tial diagnosis of the cases with pain in the right lower quadrant. Preoperative diagnosis of caecal diverticulitis cannot always be made, since the signs and symptoms are similar to acute appendicitis, but is impor­tant in order to decide how to manage this condition.Diverticulectomy and incidental appendectomy are the preferred method of treatment in uncomplicated cases. Right hemicolectomy is a recommended treatment option in complicated patients or those suspicious for tumor during surgery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. S388
Author(s):  
Rashi Kochhar ◽  
Sherif Badawy ◽  
Salman Tarek ◽  
Jennifer Chee ◽  
Yakov Volkin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document