Bio-medical analysis of breast cancer risk detection based on deep neural network

Author(s):  
Nivaashini Mathappan ◽  
R.S. Soundariya ◽  
Aravindhraj Natarajan ◽  
Sathish Kumar Gopalan
Author(s):  
Sathish Kumar Gopalan ◽  
Aravindhraj Natarajan ◽  
Nivaashini Mathappan ◽  
R.S. Soundariya

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Hung Kao

BACKGROUND Breast cancer incidence may be higher among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with the general population. This study evaluated the performance of three models for predicting breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the performance of three models for predicting breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM. METHODS In total, 1,267,867 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM between 2000 and 2012 were identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. By employing their data, we created prediction models for detecting an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer development in T2DM patients. The available potential risk factors for breast cancer were also collected for adjustment in the analyses. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was used to augment data points in the minority class. Each data point was randomly allocated to the training and test sets at a ratio of approximate 39:1. The performance of artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) models were determined using the recall, precision, F1 score, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The AUCs of all three models were significantly higher than the area of 0.5 for the null hypothesis (0.959, 0.865, and 0.834 for RF, ANN, and LR models, respectively). The RF model has the largest AUC among all models; moreover, it had the highest values in all other metrics. CONCLUSIONS Although all three models could accurately predict high breast cancer risk in patients with T2DM in Taiwan, the RF model demonstrated the best performance. CLINICALTRIAL This is not a chinical trial.


Radiographics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Turgay Ayer ◽  
Jagpreet Chhatwal ◽  
Oguzhan Alagoz ◽  
Charles E. Kahn ◽  
Ryan W. Woods ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ha ◽  
Peter Chang ◽  
Jenika Karcich ◽  
Simukayi Mutasa ◽  
Eduardo Pascual Van Sant ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Gao ◽  
Shu Li ◽  
Yujing Jin ◽  
Lengxiao Zhou ◽  
Shaomei Sun ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Background: Machine learning algorithms well-suited in cancer research, especially in breast cancer for the investigation and development of riTo assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model. OBJECTIVE Objective: To assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model. METHODS Methods: As of June 9, 2021, articles on breast cancer risk prediction models by machine learning were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies describing the development or validation of risk prediction models for predicting future breast cancer risk were included. Pooled area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS Result: A total of 8 studies with 10 datasets were included. Neural network was the most common machine learning method for the development of risk prediction models. The pooled AUC of machine learning-based optimal risk prediction model reported in each study was 0.73 (95%CI: 0.66-0.80), which was higher than that of traditional risk factor-based risk prediction models (all Pheterogeneity < 0.001). The pooled AUC of neural network-based risk prediction model was higher than that of non-neural network-based optimal risk prediction model (0.71 vs. 0.68). Subgroup analysis showed that incorporation of imaging features risk models had a higher pooled AUC than model of non-incorporation of imaging features (0.73 vs. 0.61; Pheterogeneity =0.001). CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: The pooled machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model yield a good prediction performance and promising results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document