Assessment of performance of the machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Gao ◽  
Shu Li ◽  
Yujing Jin ◽  
Lengxiao Zhou ◽  
Shaomei Sun ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Background: Machine learning algorithms well-suited in cancer research, especially in breast cancer for the investigation and development of riTo assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model. OBJECTIVE Objective: To assess the performance of available machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model. METHODS Methods: As of June 9, 2021, articles on breast cancer risk prediction models by machine learning were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies describing the development or validation of risk prediction models for predicting future breast cancer risk were included. Pooled area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS Result: A total of 8 studies with 10 datasets were included. Neural network was the most common machine learning method for the development of risk prediction models. The pooled AUC of machine learning-based optimal risk prediction model reported in each study was 0.73 (95%CI: 0.66-0.80), which was higher than that of traditional risk factor-based risk prediction models (all Pheterogeneity < 0.001). The pooled AUC of neural network-based risk prediction model was higher than that of non-neural network-based optimal risk prediction model (0.71 vs. 0.68). Subgroup analysis showed that incorporation of imaging features risk models had a higher pooled AUC than model of non-incorporation of imaging features (0.73 vs. 0.61; Pheterogeneity =0.001). CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: The pooled machine learning-based breast cancer risk prediction model yield a good prediction performance and promising results.

Author(s):  
Julie R. Palmer ◽  
Gary Zirpoli ◽  
Kimberly A. Bertrand ◽  
Tracy Battaglia ◽  
Leslie Bernstein ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Breast cancer risk prediction models are used to identify high-risk women for early detection, targeted interventions, and enrollment into prevention trials. We sought to develop and evaluate a risk prediction model for breast cancer in US Black women, suitable for use in primary care settings. METHODS Breast cancer relative risks and attributable risks were estimated using data from Black women in three US population-based case-control studies (3,468 breast cancer cases; 3,578 controls age 30-69 years) and combined with SEER age- and race-specific incidence rates, with incorporation of competing mortality, to develop an absolute risk model. The model was validated in prospective data among 51,798 participants of the Black Women's Health Study, including 1,515 who developed invasive breast cancer. A second risk prediction model was developed on the basis of estrogen receptor (ER)–specific relative risks and attributable risks. Model performance was assessed by calibration (expected/observed cases) and discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic). RESULTS The expected/observed ratio was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.07). Age-adjusted C-statistics were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.59) overall and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.68) among women younger than 40 years. These measures were almost identical in the model based on estrogen receptor–specific relative risks and attributable risks. CONCLUSION Discriminatory accuracy of the new model was similar to that of the most frequently used questionnaire-based breast cancer risk prediction models in White women, suggesting that effective risk stratification for Black women is now possible. This model may be especially valuable for risk stratification of young Black women, who are below the ages at which breast cancer screening is typically begun.


2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Boggs ◽  
Lynn Rosenberg ◽  
Michael J. Pencina ◽  
Lucile L. Adams-Campbell ◽  
Julie R. Palmer

2013 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian S. Dite ◽  
Maryam Mahmoodi ◽  
Adrian Bickerstaffe ◽  
Fleur Hammet ◽  
Robert J. Macinnis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Gao ◽  
Parichoy Pal Choudhury ◽  
Paige Maas ◽  
Rulla Tamimi ◽  
Heather Eliassen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chi Gao ◽  
Parichoy Pal Choudhury ◽  
Paige Maas ◽  
Rulla Tamimi ◽  
Heather Eliassen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document