Knocking diagnostics in the combustion chamber of boosted port fuel injection spark ignition optical engine

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (1/2/3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona S. Merola ◽  
Paolo Sementa ◽  
Cinzia Tornatore ◽  
Bianca M. Vaglieco
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoisan Kim ◽  
Suckju Yoon ◽  
Ming-Chia Lai ◽  
Sergio Quelhas ◽  
Richard Boyd ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanderson Navegantes Rodrigues ◽  
Lucas Ramos Pumputis ◽  
Heder Fernandes ◽  
Igor Cordeiro Trevas ◽  
Venicio Teixeira Nascimento Neto

2021 ◽  
pp. 146808742110531
Author(s):  
Stefan Eicheldinger ◽  
Stephan Karmann ◽  
Maximilian Prager ◽  
Georg Wachtmeister

Further improvement of hydrogen combustion in port fuel injection engines is limited by backfire. To overcome this drawback of hydrogen port fuel injection engines it is essential to locate and understand the reasons for the inflammation of a backfiring cycle. To contribute to this understanding a minimal invasive lateral optical access was developed for a medium speed large bore engine. The access uses a UV enhanced endoscope to investigate the OH radical’s natural chemiluminescence to locate the inflammation of a backfiring cycle in the combustion chamber. The investigations are carried out at high engine load. The optical investigations were based on a thermodynamic screening. This included the variation of the start of the hydrogen port fuel injection and the engine’s backpressure. These experiments prove the influence of exhaust backpressure and the start of injection on the probability of backfire. As higher backpressure leads to an increased probability of backfire, the SoI strategy has also a decisive influence. An optimum start of injection timing with less backfire under high backpressure was experimentally determined at 300°CA with respect to 720°CA as FTDC. The conducted optical investigations show that backfire starts by ignition by hot residual gasses during the first cycle located under the exhaust valves. Furthermore, the results show ongoing combustion in the intake manifold leading to serious damage of the engine if not prohibited.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Solferini de Carvalho ◽  
Alexander Peñaranda Mendoza ◽  
Leila Ribeiro dos Santos ◽  
Enrico Malheiro de Oliveira ◽  
Maycon Ferreira Silva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jianye Su ◽  
Weiyang Lin ◽  
Jeff Sterniak ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Stanislav V. Bohac

Spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) gasoline engines, especially in downsized boosted engine platforms, are increasing their market share relative to port fuel injection (PFI) engines in U.S., European and Chinese vehicles due to better fuel economy by enabling higher compression ratios and higher specific power output. However, particulate matter (PM) emissions from engines are becoming a concern due to adverse human health and environment effects, and more stringent emission standards. To conduct a PM number and size comparison between SIDI and PFI systems, a 2.0 L boosted gasoline engine has been equipped and tested with both systems at different loads, air fuel ratios, spark timings, fuel pressures and injection timings for SIDI operation and loads, air fuel ratios and spark timings for PFI operation. Regardless of load, air fuel ratio, spark timing, fuel pressure, and injection timing, particle size distribution from SIDI and PFI is shown to be bimodal, exhibiting nucleation and accumulation mode particles. SIDI produces particle numbers that are an order of magnitude greater than PFI. Particle number can be reduced by retarding spark timing and operating the engine lean, both for SIDI and PFI operation. Increasing fuel injection pressure and optimizing injection timing with SIDI also reduces PM emissions. This study provides insight into the differences in PM emissions from boosted SIDI and PFI engines and an evaluation of PM reduction potential by varying engine operating parameters in boosted SIDI and PFI gasoline engines.


Author(s):  
Jianye Su ◽  
Weiyang Lin ◽  
Jeff Sterniak ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Stanislav V. Bohac

Spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) gasoline engines, especially in downsized boosted engine platforms, are increasing their market share relative to port fuel injection (PFI) engines in U.S., European and Chinese vehicles due to better fuel economy by enabling higher compression ratios and higher specific power output. However, particulate matter (PM) emissions from engines are becoming a concern due to adverse human health and environment effects, and more stringent emission standards. To conduct a PM number and size comparison between SIDI and PFI systems, a 2.0 L boosted gasoline engine has been equipped and tested with both systems at different loads, air fuel ratios, spark timings, fuel pressures and injection timings for SIDI operation and loads, air fuel ratios and spark timings for PFI operation. Regardless of load, air fuel ratio, spark timing, fuel pressure, and injection timing, particle size distribution from SIDI and PFI is shown to be bimodal, exhibiting nucleation and accumulation mode particles. SIDI produces particle numbers that are an order of magnitude greater than PFI. Particle number can be reduced by retarding spark timing and operating the engine lean, both for SIDI and PFI operation. Increasing fuel injection pressure and optimizing injection timing with SIDI also reduces PM emissions. This study provides insight into the differences in PM emissions from boosted SIDI and PFI engines and an evaluation of PM reduction potential by varying engine operating parameters in boosted SIDI and PFI gasoline engines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document