APPENDIX. THE NOBLE DEATHS OF SOCRATES AND DAVID HUME

Adam Ferguson was a Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh and a leading member of the Scottish Enlightenment. A friend of David Hume and Adam Smith, Ferguson was among the leading exponents of the Scottish Enlightenment’s attempts to develop a science of man and was among the first in the English speaking world to make use of the terms civilization, civil society, and political science. This book challenges many of the prevailing assumptions about Ferguson’s thinking. It explores how Ferguson sought to create a methodology for moral science that combined empirically based social theory with normative moralising with a view to supporting the virtuous education of the British elite. The Ferguson that emerges is far from the stereotyped image of a nostalgic republican sceptical about modernity, and instead is one much closer to the mainstream Scottish Enlightenment’s defence of eighteenth century British commercial society.

Download Full-text

Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment

10.3366/edinburgh/9781474415019.001.0001 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Christopher J. Berry

Keyword(s):

Intellectual History ◽

David Hume ◽

Adam Smith ◽

Detailed Examination ◽

Scottish Enlightenment ◽

Subsequent Work ◽

Retrospective Assessment ◽

The 1960S

A collection of essays by a leading scholar. The work selected spans several decades, which together with three new unpublished pieces, cumulatively constitute a distinct interpretation of the Scottish Enlightenment as a whole while incorporating detailed examination of the work of David Hume and Adam Smith. There is, in addition, a substantial introduction which, alongside Berry’s personal intellectual history, provides a commentary on the development of the study of the Scottish Enlightenment from the 1960s. Each of the previously published chapters includes a postscript where Berry comments on subsequent work and his own retrospective assessment. The recurrent themes are the ideas of sociability and socialisation, the Humean science of man and Smith’s analysis of the relation between commerce and morality.

Download Full-text

Two Intellectual Landmarks in the Year 1749

Journal of Scottish Philosophy ◽

10.3366/jsp.2019.0231 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 101-123

Author(s):

Farhad Rassekh

Keyword(s):

Paradigm Shift ◽

David Hume ◽

Adam Smith ◽

Considerable Extent ◽

Monetary Theory ◽

Economic Theories ◽

Classical Economics ◽

Wealth Of Nations ◽

Economic Thinking

In the year 1749 Adam Smith conceived his theory of commercial liberty and David Hume laid the foundation of his monetary theory. These two intellectual developments, despite their brevity, heralded a paradigm shift in economic thinking. Smith expanded and promulgated his theory over the course of his scholarly career, culminating in the publication of The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Hume elaborated on the constituents of his monetary framework in several essays that were published in 1752. Although Smith and Hume devised their economic theories in 1749 independently, these theories complemented each other and to a considerable extent created the structure of classical economics.

Download Full-text

David Hume in his Private Correspondence

Scottish Affairs ◽

10.3366/scot.2011.0047 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 76 (First Serie (1) ◽

pp. 128-132

Author(s):

Paul Henderson Scott

Keyword(s):

David Hume ◽

Private Correspondence

Download Full-text

Beérkezett könyvek

Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle ◽

10.1556/mpszle.61.2006.4.8 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 61 (4) ◽

pp. 657-658

Author(s):

Csaba Pléh

Keyword(s):

David Hume ◽

Complementary Nature

Arisztotelész: Lélekfilozófiai írások. (Fordította: Steiger Kornél) Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 2006 David Hume: Értekezés az emberi természetről . (Fordította: Bence György) Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 2006 Kelso, J. A. Scott és Engstrøm, David A.: The complementary nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006 Fehér Márta, Zemplén Gábor és Binzberger Viktor (szerk.): Értelem és történelem. L'Harmattan, Budapest, 2006 Márkus Attila: Neurológia. Pszichológia szakos hallgatók számára. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 2006 Cayton, H., Graham, N. és Warner, J.: Alzheimer-kór és a demencia egyéb fajtái . (Fordította: Nikowitz Krisztina) SpringMed Kiadó, Budapest, 2006 Houdé, Olivier: 10 leçons de psychologie et pédagogie . Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2006 Velicskovszkij, Borisz M.: Kognyityivnaja nauka. Osznovi pszichologii poznanyija . Vol. I-II.Academa-Szmüszl. Moszkva, 2006 Fábri György (szerk.): A tudománykommunikáció értelme/értéke. Tudástársadalom Alapítvány, Budapest, 2006 Ropolyi László: Az Internet természete. Internetfilozófiai értekezés. Typotex, Budapest, 2006

Download Full-text

RACIAL STEREOTYPING OF HOMO SAPIENS AFRICANUS: A REVIEW OF ITS MYTH AND IMPACT ON DEVELOPMENTAL CAPACITY

Africanus Journal of Development Studies ◽

10.25159/0304-615x/619 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 45 (2) ◽

pp. 49-71 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Seth Oppong

Keyword(s):

Immanuel Kant ◽

David Hume ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Homo Sapiens ◽

Supporting Evidence ◽

White People ◽

Negative Stereotypes ◽

Initial Errors ◽

Developmental Capacity ◽

Lower Intelligence

Generally, negatives stereotypes have been shown to have negative impact on performance members of a social group that is the target of the stereotype (Schmader, Johns and Forbes 2008; Steele and Aronson, 1995). It is against the background of this evidence that this paper argues that the negative stereotypes of perceived lower intelligence held against Africans has similar impact on the general development of the continent. This paper seeks to challenge this stereotype by tracing the source of this negative stereotype to David Hume and Immanuel Kant and showing the initial errors they committed which have influenced social science knowledge about race relations. Hume and Kant argue that Africans are naturally inferior to white or are less intelligent and support their thesis with their contrived evidence that there has never been any civilized nation other than those developed by white people nor any African scholars of eminence. Drawing on Anton Wilhelm Amoâ€™s negligence-ignorance thesis, this paper shows the Hume-Kantian argument and the supporting evidence to be fallacious.Â

Download Full-text