15. Markov perfect equilibria with robustness

Robustness ◽  
2008 ◽  
pp. 327-332
2014 ◽  
Vol 419 (2) ◽  
pp. 1322-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Andrzej S. Nowak

Author(s):  
Anna Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Andrzej S. Nowak

AbstractWe study Markov decision processes with Borel state spaces under quasi-hyperbolic discounting. This type of discounting nicely models human behaviour, which is time-inconsistent in the long run. The decision maker has preferences changing in time. Therefore, the standard approach based on the Bellman optimality principle fails. Within a dynamic game-theoretic framework, we prove the existence of randomised stationary Markov perfect equilibria for a large class of Markov decision processes with transitions having a density function. We also show that randomisation can be restricted to two actions in every state of the process. Moreover, we prove that under some conditions, this equilibrium can be replaced by a deterministic one. For models with countable state spaces, we establish the existence of deterministic Markov perfect equilibria. Many examples are given to illustrate our results, including a portfolio selection model with quasi-hyperbolic discounting.


2014 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Balbus ◽  
Anna Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Andrzej S. Nowak

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 3228-3260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gupta ◽  
Ashutosh Nayyar ◽  
Cédric Langbort ◽  
Tamer Başar

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hassler ◽  
José V Rodríguez Mora ◽  
Kjetil Storesletten ◽  
Fabrizio Zilibotti

This paper provides an analytical characterization of Markov perfect equilibria in a model with repeated voting, where agents vote over distortionary income redistribution. A key result is that the future constituency for redistributive policies depends positively on current redistribution, since this affects both private investments and the future distribution of voters. The model features multiple equilibria. In some equilibria, positive redistribution persists forever. In other equilibria, even a majority of beneficiaries of redistribution vote strategically so as to induce the end of the welfare state next period. Skill-biased technical change makes the survival of the welfare state less likely.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document