Critical Survey of Stability Constants of Complexes of Glycine Series Title: Critical Evaluation of Stability Constants of Metal Complexes in Solution

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kiss ◽  
I. Sóvágó ◽  
A. Gergely
2005 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 1445-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Anderegg ◽  
Francoise Arnaud-Neu ◽  
Rita Delgado ◽  
Judith Felcman ◽  
Konstantin Popov

Available experimental data on stability constants of proton (hydron) and metal complexes for seven complexones of particular biomedical and environmental interest: iminodiacetic acid [2,2'-azanediyldiacetic acid, IDA], (methylimino)diacetic acid [2,2'-(methylazanediyl)diacetic acid, MIDA]; 2,2',2'',2'''-{[(carboxymethyl)azanediyl]bis[(ethane-1,2-diyl)nitrilo]}tetraacetic acid (DTPA), 3,6,9,12-tetrakis(carboxymethyl)-3,6,9,12-tetraazatetradecanedioic acid (TTHA); 2,2',2''-(1,4,7-triazonane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic acid (NOTA); 2,2',2'',2'''-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid (DOTA); 2,2',2'',2'''-(1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-1,4,8,11-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid (TETA), published in 1945-2000, have been critically evaluated. Some typical errors in stability constant measurements for particular complexones are summarized. Higher quality data are selected and presented as “Recommended” or “Provisional”.


2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francoise Arnaud-Neu ◽  
Rita Delgado ◽  
Sílvia Chaves

Stability constants and thermodynamic functions of metal complexes of crown ethers in various solvents published between 1971 and the beginning of 2000 have been critically evaluated. The most studied crown ethers have been selected: 1,4,7,10 tetraoxacyclododecane (12C4), 1,4,7,10,13 pentaoxacyclopentadecane (15C5), and 1,4,7,10,13,16 hexaoxacyclooctadecane (18C6). The metal ions chosen are: alkali and alkaline earth metal ions, Ag+, Tl+, Cd2+, and Pb2+. The solvents considered are: water, methanol, ethanol, and their mixtures, as well as acetonitrile, N,N'-dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, and propylene carbonate. The published data have been examined and grouped into two categories, “accepted” and “rejected”. The “accepted” values were considered as: (i) recommended (R), when the standard deviations (s.d.) on the constant K or on ΔrH were inferior to 0.05 lg unit or inferior to 1 kJ mol−1, respectively; (ii) provisional (P), when s.d. is superior to 0.05 and inferior to 0.2 for lg K or s.d. is superior to 1 and inferior to 2 kJ mol−1 for ΔrH; (iii) recommended 1 (R1), if the values were obtained by a single research group, but were considered reliable in comparison with related systems, and considering that the research team usually presents R-level values for other similar systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document