scholarly journals Some remarks on divisible polyhedral MV-algebras

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Serafina Lapenta

AbstractBuilding on similar notions for MV-algebras, polyhedral DMV-algebras are defined and investigated. For such algebras dualities with suitable categories of polyhedra are established, and the relation with finitely presented Riesz MV-algebras is investigated. Via hull-functors, finite products are interpreted in terms of hom-functors, and categories of polyhedral MV-algebras, polyhedral DMV-algebras and finitely presented Riesz MV-algebras are linked together. Moreover, the amalgamation property is proved for finitely presented DMV-algebras and Riesz MV-algebras, and for polyhedral DMV-algebras.

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
OLIVIA CARAMELLO ◽  
ANNA CARLA RUSSO

AbstractWe establish, generalizing Di Nola and Lettieri’s categorical equivalence, a Morita-equivalence between the theory of lattice-ordered abelian groups and that of perfect MV-algebras. Further, after observing that the two theories are not bi-interpretable in the classical sense, we identify, by considering appropriate topos-theoretic invariants on their common classifying topos, three levels of bi-interpretability holding for particular classes of formulas: irreducible formulas, geometric sentences, and imaginaries. Lastly, by investigating the classifying topos of the theory of perfect MV-algebras, we obtain various results on its syntax and semantics also in relation to the cartesian theory of the variety generated by Chang’s MV-algebra, including a concrete representation for the finitely presentable models of the latter theory as finite products of finitely presentable perfect MV-algebras. Among the results established on the way, we mention a Morita-equivalence between the theory of lattice-ordered abelian groups and that of cancellative lattice-ordered abelian monoids with bottom element.


10.29007/7htj ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Marra ◽  
Daniel McNeill ◽  
Andrea Pedrini

This is the first part of a series of two abstract, the second one being by Daniel McNeill.If X is any topological space, its collection of opens sets O(X) is a complete distributive lattice and also a Heyting algebra. When X is equipped with a distinguished basis D(X) for its topology, closed under finite meets and joins, one can investigate situations where D(X) is also a Heyting subalgebra of O(X).Recall that X is a spectral space if it is compact and T0, its collection D(X) of compact open subsets forms a basis which is closed under finite intersections and unions, and X is sober. By Stone duality, spectral spaces are precisely the spaces arising as sets of prime ideals of some distributive lattice, topologised with the Stone or hull-kernel topology. Specifically, given such a spectral space X, its collection of compact open sets D(X) is (naturally isomorphic to) the distributive lattice dual to X under Stone duality.We are going to exhibit a significant class of such spaces for which D(X) is a Heyting subalgebra of O(X).We work with lattice-ordered Abelian groups and vector spaces. Using Mundici’s Gamma-functor the results can be rephrased in terms of MV-algebras, the algebraic semantics of Lukasiewicz infinite-valued propositional logic.Let (G,u) be a finitely presented vector lattice (or Q-vector lattice, or l-group) G equipped with a distinguished strong order unit u. It turns out that Spec(G,u), i.e. the the space of prime ideals of (G,u) topologised with the hull-kernel topology, is a compact spectral space. Our first main result states that the collection D(Spec(G,u)) of compact open subsets of Spec(G,u) is a Heyting subalgebra of the Heyting algebra of open subsets O(Spec(G,u)).As a consequence, we also prove that the subspace Min(G,u) of minimal prime ideals of G is a Boolean space, i.e. a compact Hausdorff space whose clopen sets form a basis for the topology.Further, for any fixed maximal ideal m of G, the set l(m) of prime ideals of G contained in m, equipped with the subspace topology, is a spectral space, and the subspace Min(l(m)) of l(m) is a Boolean space.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Mundici ◽  
Andrea Pedrini

AbstractEvery finitely presented MV-algebra A has a unique idempotent valuation E assigning value 1 to every basic element of A. For each a ∈ A, E(a) turns out to coincide with the Euler characteristic of the open set of maximal ideals m of A such that a/m is nonzero.


1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Wheeler

A first-order theory is companionable if it is mutually model-consistent with a model-complete theory. The latter theory is then called a model-companion for the former theory. For example, the theory of formally real fields is a companionable theory; its model-companion is the theory of real closed fields. If a companionable, inductive theory has the amalgamation property, then its model-companion is actually a model-completion. For example, the theory of fields is a companionable, inductive theory with the amalgamation property; its model-completion is the theory of algebraically closed fields.The goal of this paper is the characterization, by “algebraic” or “structural” properties, of the companionable, universal theories which satisfy a certain finiteness condition. A theory is companionable precisely when the theory consisting of its universal consequences is companionable. Both theories have the same model-companion if either has one. Accordingly, nought is lost by the restriction to universal theories. The finiteness condition, finite presentation decompositions, is an analogue for an arbitrary theory of the decomposition of a radical ideal in a Noetherian, commutative ring into a finite intersection of prime ideals for the theory of integral domains. The companionable theories with finite presentation decompositions are characterized by two properties: a coherence property for finitely generated submodels of finitely presented models and a homomorphism lifting property for homomorphisms from submodels of finitely presented models.


10.29007/bt3m ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Marra ◽  
Daniel Mcneill ◽  
Andrea Pedrini

This is the second part of a series of two abstracts, the first being by Andrea Pedrini. For background and notation on lattice-ordered Abelian groups, vector lattices and Q-vector lattices, and their spectral spaces, please see her submission.We consider the tools of Stone duality and the absolute applied to lattice-ordered Abelian groups, vector lattices and Q-vector lattices. Given a lattice-ordered Abelian group or Q-vector lattice, G, this leads to an interesting parallel between Min(G) and the absolute of Max(G).


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Zosin Sergiu Petri ◽  
◽  
Dumitru Ristoiu ◽  
Mihail Simion Beldean-Galea ◽  
Radu Mihăiescu ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Belluce
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document