Complex Training in Professional Rugby Players: Influence of Recovery Time on Upper-Body Power Output

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1780-1785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huw R Bevan ◽  
Nick J Owen ◽  
Dan J Cunningham ◽  
Mike IC Kingsley ◽  
Liam P Kilduff
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2282-2287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. West ◽  
Daniel J. Cunningham ◽  
Blair T. Crewther ◽  
Christian J. Cook ◽  
Liam P. Kilduff

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy R.J. Mason ◽  
Christos K. Argus ◽  
Ben Norcott ◽  
Nick B. Ball

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Analiza M. Silva ◽  
Catarina Matias ◽  
Ana L. Quitério ◽  
Susana Oliveira ◽  
Diana Santos ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loudovikos Dimitrios Liossis ◽  
Jacky Forsyth ◽  
Ceorge Liossis ◽  
Charilaos Tsolakis

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effect of upper body complex training on power output, as well as to determine the requisite preload intensity and intra-complex recovery interval needed to induce power output increases. Nine amateur-level combat/martial art athletes completed four distinct experimental protocols, which consisted of 5 bench press repetitions at either: 65% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) with a 4 min rest interval; 65% of 1RM with an 8 min rest; 85% of 1RM with a 4 min rest; or 85% of 1RM with an 8 min rest interval, performed on different days. Before (pre-conditioning) and after (post-conditioning) each experimental protocol, three bench press throws at 30% of 1RM were performed. Significant differences in power output pre-post conditioning were observed across all experimental protocols (F=26.489, partial eta2=0.768, p=0.001). Mean power output significantly increased when the preload stimulus of 65% 1RM was matched with 4 min of rest (p=0.001), and when the 85% 1RM preload stimulus was matched with 8 min of rest (p=0.001). Moreover, a statistically significant difference in power output was observed between the four conditioning protocols (F= 21.101, partial eta²=0.913, p=0.001). It was concluded that, in complex training, matching a heavy preload stimulus with a longer rest interval, and a lighter preload stimulus with a shorter rest interval is important for athletes wishing to increase their power production before training or competition.


2009 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Erik A. Jacobson ◽  
Robert Pickels ◽  
Daniel P. Heil

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S363
Author(s):  
B K. Higginson ◽  
D P. Heil ◽  
J Engen

Author(s):  
Emma L Wilkins ◽  
George Havenith

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of using an electrical heating garment during a 30-min recovery period after a standardized swimming warm-up on subsequent swimming performance and upper body power output. On two occasions, eight male and four female elite competitive swimmers completed a standardized swimming warm-up, followed by a 30-min passive recovery period before completing maximal plyometric press-ups and a 50-m freestyle swim. Plyometric press-ups determined starting strength, peak force and peak concentric power. During the recovery period, participants wore tracksuit bottoms and (1) a standard tracksuit top (CON) or (2) jacket with integrated electric heating elements (HEAT). The overall results demonstrated a trend of a relevant (>0.4%) improvement in the 50-m freestyle performance of 0.83% ( p = 0.06) in HEAT versus CON. In male participants, performance in the 50-m freestyle significantly improved by 1.01% (CON 25.18 ± 0.5 s vs HEAT 24.93 ± 0.4 s; p < 0.05), whereas female participants only showed a trend for an improvement of 0.38% (29.18 ± 0.5 s vs 29.03 ± 1.0 s; p = 0.09), in HEAT compared with CON, although statistical power for the latter test was low. Male participants’ starting strength, peak force and peak concentric power were 16.5 ± 13%, 18.1 ± 21% and 16.2 ± 21% greater, respectively, in HEAT compared with CON (all p < 0.01). In conclusion, external heating of the upper body between completion of the warm-up and performance through the utilization of an electrically heated jacket improves plyometric press-up power output and force production, as well as sprint swimming performance in males. This provides justification for future enhancement opportunities in sporting performance through the utilization of external heating systems. Optimization of the heating system for specific sports is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document