scholarly journals State-Dependent Interactions between Excitatory Neuromodulators in the Neuronal Control of Breathing

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (24) ◽  
pp. 8251-8262 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Doi ◽  
J.-M. Ramirez
2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Nakamura ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Masashi Yanagisawa ◽  
Yasuichiro Fukuda ◽  
Tomoyuki Kuwaki

Exogenous administration of orexin can promote wakefulness and respiration. Here we examined whether intrinsic orexin participates in the control of breathing in a vigilance state-dependent manner. Ventilation was recorded together with electroencephalography and electromyography for 6 h during the daytime in prepro-orexin knockout mice (ORX-KO) and wild-type (WT) littermates. Respiratory parameters were separately determined during quiet wakefulness (QW), slow-wave sleep (SWS), or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Basal ventilation was normal in ORX-KO, irrespective of vigilance states. The hypercapnic ventilatory response during QW in ORX-KO (0.19 ± 0.01 ml·min−1·g−1·%CO2−1) was significantly smaller than that in WT mice (0.38 ± 0.04 ml·min−1·g−1·%CO2−1), whereas the responses during SWS and REM in ORX-KO were comparable to those in WT mice. Hypoxic responses during wake and sleep periods were not different between the genotypes. Spontaneous but not postsigh sleep apneas were more frequent in ORX-KO than in WT littermates during both SWS and REM sleep. Our findings suggest that orexin plays a crucial role both in CO2 sensitivity during wakefulness and in preserving ventilation stability during sleep.


2015 ◽  
Vol 593 (13) ◽  
pp. 2909-2926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G.R. Burke ◽  
Roy Kanbar ◽  
Tyler M. Basting ◽  
Walter M. Hodges ◽  
Kenneth E. Viar ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Marino Ramirez ◽  
Henner Koch ◽  
Alfredo J. Garcia ◽  
Atsushi Doi ◽  
Sebastien Zanella

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 475-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Marino Ramirez ◽  
Nathan A. Baertsch

Rhythmicity is a universal timing mechanism in the brain, and the rhythmogenic mechanisms are generally dynamic. This is illustrated for the neuronal control of breathing, a behavior that occurs as a one-, two-, or three-phase rhythm. Each breath is assembled stochastically, and increasing evidence suggests that each phase can be generated independently by a dedicated excitatory microcircuit. Within each microcircuit, rhythmicity emerges through three entangled mechanisms: ( a) glutamatergic transmission, which is amplified by ( b) intrinsic bursting and opposed by ( c) concurrent inhibition. This rhythmogenic triangle is dynamically tuned by neuromodulators and other network interactions. The ability of coupled oscillators to reconfigure and recombine may allow breathing to remain robust yet plastic enough to conform to nonventilatory behaviors such as vocalization, swallowing, and coughing. Lessons learned from the respiratory network may translate to other highly dynamic and integrated rhythmic systems, if approached one breath at a time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document