Species-specific Survival and Relative Habitat Use in an Urban Landscape during the Postfledging Period

The Auk ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Whittaker ◽  
John M. Marzluff
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 977-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Abu Baker ◽  
Sara E. Emerson ◽  
Joel S. Brown

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P Dunagan ◽  
Tim J Karels ◽  
Joanne G Moriarty ◽  
Justin L Brown ◽  
Seth P D Riley
Keyword(s):  

Biologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sweta Bhattacharya ◽  
Kanad Roy ◽  
Goutam Kumar Saha ◽  
Subhendu Mazumdar

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura L. Patton ◽  
David S. Maehr ◽  
Joseph E. Duchamp ◽  
Songlin Fei ◽  
Jonathan W. Gassett ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 140200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Lintott ◽  
Nils Bunnefeld ◽  
Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor ◽  
Jeroen Minderman ◽  
Rebekah J. Mayhew ◽  
...  

Urbanization is a major driver of the global loss of biodiversity; to mitigate its adverse effects, it is essential to understand what drives species' patterns of habitat use within the urban matrix. While many animal species are known to exhibit sex differences in habitat use, adaptability to the urban landscape is commonly examined at the species level, without consideration of intraspecific differences. The high energetic demands of pregnancy and lactation in female mammals can lead to sexual differences in habitat use, but little is known of how this might affect their response to urbanization. We predicted that female Pipistrellus pygmaeus would show greater selectivity of forging locations within urban woodland in comparison to males at both a local and landscape scale. In line with these predictions, we found there was a lower probability of finding females within woodlands which were poorly connected, highly cluttered, with a higher edge : interior ratio and fewer mature trees. By contrast, habitat quality and the composition of the surrounding landscape were less of a limiting factor in determining male distributions. These results indicate strong sexual differences in the habitat use of fragmented urban woodland, and this has important implications for our understanding of the adaptability of bats and mammals more generally to urbanization.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Kozlowski ◽  
Eric M. Gese ◽  
Wendy M. Arjo

Many studies determine which habitat components are important to animals and the extent their use may overlap with competitive species. However, such studies are often undertaken after populations are in decline or under interspecific stress. Since habitat selection is not independent of interspecific stress, quantifying an animal's current landscape use could be misleading if the species distribution is suboptimal. We present an alternative approach by modeling the predicted distributions of two sympatric species on the landscape using dietary preferences and prey distribution. We compared the observed habitat use of kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) against their predicted distribution. Data included locations of kit foxes and coyotes, carnivore scat transects, and seasonal prey surveys. Although habitats demonstrated heterogeneity with respect to prey resources, only coyotes showed habitat use designed to maximize access to prey. In contrast, kit foxes used habitats which did not align closely with prey resources. Instead, habitat use by kit foxes represented spatial and behavioral strategies designed to minimize spatial overlap with coyotes while maximizing access to resources. Data on the distribution of prey, their dietary importance, and the species-specific disparities between predicted and observed habitat distributions supports a mechanism by which kit fox distribution is derived from intense competitive interactions with coyotes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document