New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism

1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon K. Robbins
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M. Cornelius

It is argued that rhetorical criticism is increasingly recognized as a method of interpretation of biblical literature. From the discussion in this article it becomes clear that there are different perspectives of rhetorical criticism just as there are different theories of rhetoric. It is argued that contemporary critics need to develop an interdisciplinary method of rhetorical criticism in order to answer questions about the potential effectiveness of a rhetorical act. It is concluded that the rhetorical critic needs a combination of "old" methods in order to answer new questions.


1986 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Fowler ◽  
George A. Kennedy

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
R. L. S. Evans ◽  
George A. Kennedy

1988 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Kirby

The publication of George Kennedy'sNew Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticismmarked the full realization of a growing trend in NT criticism, whereby scholars are beginning to look beyond the limitations of form- and source-criticism for another viable hermeneutical tool. Rhetorical criticism has its origins in the classical canons conceptualized and formulated by the principal rhetoricians of Greek and Roman antiquity, such as Aristotle and Quintilian. This methodology sprang from roots in the ancient world; rhetoric was ‘one of the constraints under which New Testament writers worked’. But it has a universality that transcends its own cultural boundaries, as well as an extraordinary practicality: ‘ … it does study a verbal reality, our text of the Bible, rather than the oral sources standing behind that text, the hypothetical stages of its composition, or the impersonal workings of social forces, and at its best it can reveal the power of those texts as unitary messages’’. Often, too, it is capable of slashing through exegetical Gordian knots that prove otherwise intractable. The ability of rhetorical criticism to evaluate even the more opaque or mystical portions of the NT is a measure of its effectiveness.


Author(s):  
Stanley E. Porter

Rhetorical criticism has emerged since the mid-1970s as an important form of criticism of the New Testament. This chapter offers a critical summary and assessment of such research. There are several different types of rhetorical criticism, but the major form practiced in New Testament studies is based upon utilizing the categories of ancient rhetoric as an interpretive tool. The chapter criticizes this approach for failing to assess accurately the ancient context of the New Testament. Then a number of positive ways that rhetoric in various forms—analysis of style, the New Rhetoric, discourse analysis, text linguistics, and socio-rhetorical criticism—can be used in New Testament studies are proposed.


Theology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 88 (724) ◽  
pp. 309-310
Author(s):  
Frank Kermode

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stamps Dennis L

Bijdragen ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAN LAMBRECHT

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document