Heterotopic ossification in 453 chronic spinal injury patients

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamsa Sharitapanahi ◽  
Shahrzad Shariatpanahi
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Craig Uejo ◽  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Evaluators who use the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, should understand the significant changes that have occurred (as well as the Clarifications and Corrections) in impairment ratings for disorders of the cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, and pelvis. The new methodology is an expansion of the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) method used in the fifth edition, but the criteria for defining impairment are revised, and the impairment value within a class is refined by information related to functional status, physical examination findings, and the results of clinical testing. Because current medical evidence does not support range-of-motion (ROM) measurements of the spine as a reliable indicator of specific pathology or permanent functional status, ROM is no longer used as a basis for defining impairment. The DRE method should standardize and simplify the rating process, improve validity, and provide a more uniform methodology. Table 1 shows examples of spinal injury impairment rating (according to region of the spine and category, with comments about the diagnosis and the resulting class assignment); Table 2 shows examples of spine impairment by region of the spine, class, diagnosis, and associated whole person impairment ratings form the sixth and fifth editions of the AMA Guides.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-405
Author(s):  
Michael Sawyer ◽  
Candise K. Zbieranek
Keyword(s):  

Clinical Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Hyun Min Jeon ◽  
Hee Seung Yang ◽  
Jin Seok Seo ◽  
Seok Cheol Han ◽  
Wan Tae Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document