Low-dose growth hormone-releasing hormone tests: a dose–response study

1994 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen A Spoudeas ◽  
Andy P Winrow ◽  
Peter C Hindmarsh ◽  
Charles GD Brook

Spoudeas HA, Winrow AP, Hindmarsh PC, Brook CGD. Low-dose growth hormone-releasing hormone tests: a dose-response study. Eur J Endocrinol 1994;131:238–45. ISSN 0804–4643 We have evaluated parameters of the serum growth hormone (GH) concentration response to saline and 1-, 10- and 100-μg intravenous bolus doses of amide analogue of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH (1–29)NH2) given in random order to 10 adult male volunteers of median body weight 68 (60–90)kg. Compared with saline, both 10- and 100-μg GHRH(1–29)NH2 doses (but not 1 μg) resulted in significant peak GH responses (means and 95% confidence intervals: 24.03 (11.22–51.29) vs 26.09 (16.40–41.50) mU/l, respectively). Although the average rate of serum GH rise was similar after both 10 μg (2.05 (1.13–2.97) mU · l−1 · min−1) and 100 μg of GHRH(1–29)NH2 (1.52 (0.69–2.35) mU·1−1 · min−1; ANOVA F = 0.93, p = 0.35), the average rate of serum GH decline after peak GH was slower after the higher dose (10 μg vs 100 μg: 0.65 (0.40–0.90) vs 0.37 (0.23–0.50) mU·1−1·min−1; ANOVA F = 5.14, p = 0.04), suggesting continued GH secretion. Increasing GHRH(1–29)NH2 doses delayed the time to peak GH (1 μg: 7.00 (3.50–10.52) min; 10 μg: 15.80 (13.62–17.98) min; 100 μg: 24.80 (18.40–31.12) min) and serum GH levels were still elevated significantly 2 h after injection of 100 μg GHRH(1–29)NH2 compared with other doses (saline: 0.98 (0.48–2.04) mU/1; 1 μg: 0.68 (0.48–0.93) mU/1; 10 μg: 1.07 (0.56–2.04) mU/1; 100 μg: 5.01 (2.34–10.86) mU/l; ANOVA F = 11.10, p < 0.001). In a second study we tested five adult male volunteers with lower doses (0.5–10 μg) of GHRH(1–29)NH2. Consistent responses were observed only at doses equal to or greater than 2.5 μg and all occurred between 10 and 25 min. The estimated ed50 for GHRH(1–29)NH2 from the combined study data was 7.5 μg (0.08 μg/kg; range 0.06–0.12 μg/kg). The 10-μg dose of GHRH(1–29)NH2 was a maximal stimulus in all release parameters examined and GH peaks of < 15 mU/l (10th centile) should be considered potentially abnormal. Lower doses of GHRH(1–29)NH2 released GH quicker than higher doses, which simply prolonged the response, possibly by causing release from different pools. Our results suggest that sampling at 0, 10, 15, 20 and 25 min after a 10-μg dose of GHRH(1–29)NH2 will identify all GH peaks. CGD Brook, The Endocrine Unit, Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer Street, London WIN 8AA, UK

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 14-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carles M. Villabona ◽  
Joan Soler ◽  
Nuria Virgili ◽  
Jos&eacute; M. G&oacute;mez ◽  
Eduard Monta&ntilde;a ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Lefebvre ◽  
Lutgarde De Paepe ◽  
Roger Abs ◽  
Jacques Rahier ◽  
Philippe Selvais ◽  
...  

Lefebvre S, De Paepe L, Abs R, Rahier J, Selvais P, Maiter D. Subcutaneous octreotide treatment of a growth hormone-releasing hormone-secreting bronchial carcinoid: superiority of continuous versus intermittent administration to control hormonal secretion. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;133:320–4. ISSN 0804–4643 Diagnosis of ectopic acromegaly was made in a 21-year-old female patient who 3 years before had undergone a right pneumectomy for a disseminated bronchial carcinoid. Plasma growth hormonereleasing hormone (GHRH) concentrations were markedly elevated (6440 ng/l; normal value <100 ng/l), as were serum GH (187 μg/l; normal <5 μg/l) and plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels (6.7 U/ml; normal <2 U/ml). Retrospective immunohistochemical examination of the carcinoid tumor was positive for GHRH and the tumoral content of GHRH was 2130 ng/g wet weight. Subcutaneous treatment with octreotide was begun and first resulted in a profound inhibition of GH hypersecretion, normalization of plasma IGF-I and only partial reduction of GHRH concentrations. However, the initial dose of 3 × 100 μg had to be increased gradually to 4 × 750 μg because of a progressive deterioration of the hormonal control. After 15 months of intermittent therapy, octreotide was administered by continuous sc infusion. This treatment improved compliance, allowed the daily dose of octreotide to be reduced to 1500 μg and normalized serum GH levels. A near-normalization of the plasma IGF-I concentrations was also obtained, whereas the suppression of plasma GHRH concentrations remained incomplete. Despite favorable evolution of the endocrine parameters, intramedullar metastases were diagnosed and required radiation therapy. This observation emphasizes the superiority of continuous over intermittent administration of octreotide in the treatment of ectopic acromegaly. It also shows that the somatostatin analog acts more at the pituitary level to inhibit GH secretion than at the site of the neuroendocrine tumor. S Lefebvre, Division of Rheumatology, Clinique du Refuge, Rue du Couvent 39, B-7700 Mouscron, Belgium


1989 ◽  
Vol 120 (3_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S72-S73
Author(s):  
K. RAABE ◽  
R. ROSSKAMP ◽  
J. KLUMPP ◽  
F. HAVERKAMP

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S26-S26
Author(s):  
A P Winrow ◽  
H Spoudeas ◽  
P J Pringle ◽  
P C Hindmarsh ◽  
C G D Brook

Endocrinology ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 1362-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
PHILIP ZEITLER ◽  
JESUS ARGENTE ◽  
JULIE A. CHOWEN-BREED ◽  
DONALD K. CLIFTON ◽  
ROBERT A. STEINER

1988 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. R1-R2 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.K.K. Chatterjee ◽  
J.A. Ball ◽  
C. Proby ◽  
J.M. Burrin ◽  
S.R. Bloom

ABSTRACT In five healthy normal male volunteers, pretreatment with the cholinergic muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine (30 mg i.v.) almost abolished the growth hormone (GH) response to a maximal dose (120 μg i.v.) of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (GH response at 40 min 5.6 ± 1.3 mU/l with GHRH and pirenzepine vs 40.8 ± 5.3 mU/l with GHRH alone, P <0.02). Concomitant i.v. infusion of galanin (40 pmol/kg/min) with pirenzepine not only restored but significantly potentiated the GH response to GHRH (GH at 40 min 72.2 ± 10.5 mU/l, P <0.001 vs GHRH and pirenzepine, P <0.02 vs GHRH alone). Previous studies have proposed that cholinergic pathways control GH release via samatostatin and this study suggests that galanin may act by modulating hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone either directly or, possibly, by facilitating cholinergic neurotransmission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document