Effect of growth hormone treatment on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in prepubertal boys with short stature

1994 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Åman ◽  
Sten Rosberg ◽  
Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland

Aman J. Rosberg S, Albertsson-Wikland K. Effect of growth hormone treatment on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in prepubertal boys with short stature. Eur Endocrinol 1994;131:246–50. ISSN 0804–4643 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism of daily growth hormone (GH) treatment, 0.1 U/kg. for up to 3 years in 42 short prepubertal boys without GH deficiency. Their median height standard deviation (sd) score increased from −2.7 to −1.7, whereas their weight for height sd score was unchanged after 3 years of treatment. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations were unchanged, but median fasting insulin concentrations increased from 6.0 mU/l before treatment to 7.8 mU/l (p < 0.05) after the first year. No further increase was seen during the second or third years. The median insulin area under the curve 10–60 min after an intravenous glucose tolerance test increased from 480 mU·1−1·min−1 before treatment to 799 mU·1−1 · min−1 (p < 0.05) after 1 year. The median glucose disposal rate (K value) before GH treatment, 2.2%/min, was unchanged after 1 year of treatment. A significant positive correlation was found between the change in the height sd score and the change in fasting insulin concentration during the first (r = 0.45; p < 0.01) and second (r = 0.56; p < 0.05) years of GH treatment. It was concluded that GH treatment in prepubertal children without GH deficiency caused a moderate increase in fasting and stimulated insulin concentrations during the first year of treatment. There was no further change during the following years of treatment, and there were no negative effects on fasting plasma glucose concentrations or glucose disposal rates. The increase in insulin concentration was related positively to the growth response. Jan Åman, Department of Pediatrics, Örebro Medical Centre Hospital, S-701 85 Örebro, Sweden

2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa C van Bunderen ◽  
Nadège C van Varsseveld ◽  
Martijn W Heymans ◽  
Anton A M Franken ◽  
Hans P F Koppeschaar ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe effect of GH deficiency (GHD) on the metabolic profile of acromegaly patients is unclear in patients previously treated for acromegaly, as are the efficacy and safety of GH treatment in this particular group. The aim of the study is to describe the characteristics of patients with severe GHD who were previously treated for acromegaly, and to investigate the effects of long-term GH treatment on cardiovascular risk factors and morbidity, compared with patients who were treated for a nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA).DesignA nationwide surveillance study.MethodsSixty-five patients from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in Adults with previous acromegaly were compared with 778 patients with previous NFPA. Cardiovascular indices, including body composition, lipid profile, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and morbidity were investigated.ResultsGHD patients with previous acromegaly had an unfavorable metabolic profile comparable with or more than GHD patients with previous NFPA. GH treatment led to improvement of the lipid profile in both groups, also after excluding patients using lipid-lowering medication. In patients with previous acromegaly, HbA1c levels increased more than in patients with previous NFPA (estimate 0.03, 95% CI 0.002–0.06, P=0.04). The risk for developing cardiovascular diseases was not different between the groups.ConclusionsThe patients with GHD after previous acromegaly have an unfavorable metabolic profile comparable with patients with GHD after previous NFPA. In both groups, the lipid profile improves during GH treatment. Changes in glucose metabolism should be monitored closely. GH treatment in patients with GHD previously treated for acromegaly had no deleterious effect on cardiovascular morbidity.


Pituitary ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly M. K. Biller ◽  
Hyi-Jeong Ji ◽  
Hyunji Ahn ◽  
Conrad Savoy ◽  
E. Christine Siepl ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura van Iersel ◽  
Hanneke M. van Santen ◽  
Gladys R.J. Zandwijken ◽  
Nitash Zwaveling-Soonawala ◽  
Anita C.S. Hokken-Koelega ◽  
...  

Background: Growth hormone (GH) treatment may unmask central hypothyroidism (CeH). This was first observed in children with GH deficiency (GHD), later also in adults with GHD due to acquired “organic” pituitary disease. We hypothesized that newly diagnosed CeH in children after starting GH treatment for nonacquired, apparent isolated GHD points to congenital “organic” pituitary disease. Methods: Nationwide, retrospective cohort study including all children with nonacquired GHD between 2001 and 2011 in The Netherlands. The prevalence of CeH, hypothalamic-pituitary (HP) abnormalities, and neonatal congenital hypothyroidism screening results were evaluated. Results: Twenty-three (6.3%) of 367 children with apparent isolated GHD were prescribed LT4 for presumed CeH within 2 years after starting GH treatment. Similarly to children already diagnosed with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency, 75% of these 23 had structural HP abnormalities. In children not prescribed LT4, low pre- or post-GH treatment FT4 concentrations were also associated with structural HP abnormalities. Neonatal screening results of only 4 of the 23 children could be retrieved. Conclusion: In children with nonacquired, apparent isolated GHD, a diagnosis of CeH after, or a low FT4 concentration around the start of GH treatment, is associated with congenital structural HP abnormalities, i.e., “organic” pituitary disease. Neonatal values could not be judged reliably.


1998 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guido Filler ◽  
Peter Amendt ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Kohnert ◽  
Siegmar Devaux ◽  
Jochen H.H. Ehrich

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saartje Straetemans ◽  
Raoul Rooman ◽  
Jean De Schepper

ObjectiveThe first year response to growth hormone (GH) treatment is related to the total height gain in GH treated children, but an individual poor first year response is a weak predictor of a poor total GH effect in GH deficient (GHD) children. We investigated whether an underwhelming growth response after 2 years might be a better predictor of poor adult height (AH) outcome after GH treatment in GHD children.Design and methodsHeight data of GHD children treated with GH for at least 4 consecutive years of which at least two prepubertal and who attained (near) (n)AH were retrieved from the Belgian Register for GH treated children (n = 110, 63% boys). In ROC analyses, the change in height (ΔHt) SDS after the first and second GH treatment years were tested as predictors of poor AH outcome defined as: (1) nAH SDS &lt;−2.0, or (2) nAH SDS minus mid-parental height SDS &lt;−1.3, or (3) total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0. The cut-offs for ΔHt SDS and its sensitivity at a 95% specificity level to detect poor AH outcome were determined.ResultsEleven percent of the cohort had a total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0. ROC curve testing of first and second years ΔHt SDS as a predictor for total ΔHt SDS &lt;1.0 had an AUC &gt;70%. First-year ΔHt SDS &lt;0.41 correctly identified 42% of the patients with poor AH outcome at a 95% specificity level, resulting in respectively 5/12 (4.6%) correctly identified poor final responders and 5/98 (4.5%) misclassified good final responders (ratio 1.0). ΔHt SDS after 2 prepubertal years had a cut-off level of 0.65 and a sensitivity of 50% at a 95% specificity level, resulting in respectively 6/12 (5.5%) correctly identified poor final responders and 5/98 (4.5%) misclassified good final responders (ratio 1.2).ConclusionIn GHD children the growth response after 2 prepubertal years of GH treatment did not meaningfully improve the prediction of poor AH outcome after GH treatment compared to first-year growth response parameters. Therefore, the decision to re-evaluate the diagnosis or adapt the GH dose in case of poor response after 1 year should not be postponed for another year.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Katarina Božić ◽  
Tatjana Milenković ◽  
Srđan Pašić ◽  
Katarina Mitrović ◽  
Slađana Todorović ◽  
...  

Introduction/Aim: Spondylodysplastic Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (sdEDS) is a rare genetic disorder of collagen synthesis, caused by a mutation in the B4GALT7, B3GALT6, or SLC39A13 gene. Features of this very rare disorder are short stature, hypotonia, hyperflexible joints, soft, thin, and overly stretchable skin, sparse hair and eyebrows, elderly face, wide forehead and prolonged wound healing. Molecular genetic analysis is needed for definite confirmation of the diagnosis. So far, only three case reports describing growth hormone treatment response in patients with sdEDS have been published. All of these patients had growth hormone (GH) deficiency. We present the first case report regarding growth hormone treatment response in a patient with sdEDS and normal GH secretion (without GH deficiency). Case report: Patient was a girl with short stature and normal GH secretion. Having in mind that the girl was born small for the gestational age, due to her short stature, she started using HR, before the diagnosis of sdEDS was made. Based on the lack of improvement in growth velocity as well as the girl's phenotype, genetic analyses were performed and the diagnosis of sdEDS due to biallelic mutations of the B4GALT7 gene was established. After the diagnosis of sdEDS was made and due to suboptimal response in growth velocity to the GH treatment, the GH therapy was stopped at the age of 11 years. Conclusion: This is a first case report regarding GH treatment in a child with sdEDS and normal GH secretion, demonstrating a very limited therapeutic effect of GH on linear growth in the presented patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document