Effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients? A retrospective analysis

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Bozkus ◽  
Altug Kut ◽  
Nazli Kirnap ◽  
Neslihan Bascil Tutuncu
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Bozkus ◽  
Altug Kut ◽  
Cuneyd Anil ◽  
S Mehlika Isildak ◽  
Neslihan Bascil Tutuncu

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e72-e74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin D. Hove ◽  
Kristine Færch ◽  
Thóra B. Bödvarsdóttir ◽  
Allan E. Karlsen ◽  
Jacob S. Petersen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivashankara Bhat ◽  
Mukta Chowta ◽  
Nithyananda Chowta ◽  
Rajeshwari Shastry ◽  
Priyanka Kamath

Background: Type 2 diabetic patients often require insulin therapy for better glycaemic control. However, many of these patients do not receive insulin or do not receive it in a timely manner. Objective: The study was planned to assess the proportion of type 2 diabetic patients attaining treatment goals as per the ADA 2018 guidelines. In addition, patient’s perception on insulin therapy assessed and compared between insulin naïve and insulin initiated type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: The study was conducted in type 2 diabetic patients. Data on their demographics, medical history, duration of diabetes, history of diabetes related complications, the current antidiabetic medication received, most recent glycaemic parameters were noted. Patient’s perception on insulin initiation was recorded through structured interview. Results: A total of 129 patients were included in the study. Around 76.7% patients achieved HbA1c target (<7%). Duration of the disease is much higher in patients who did not meet the HBA1c target. A good number of patients felt that insulin injection would be physically painful (56.5%). Majority of the patients also felt that insulin will make their life less flexible (64.8%). Many patients are having the opinion that insulin is required for life long (73.2%). More number of patients on insulin agreed with the statement ‘Leads to good short-term outcomes as well as long-term benefits’ compared to insulin naïve patients. Conclusion: The results highlight that the proportion of patients achieving recommended glycaemic target is not satisfactory. Many patients who are inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs were reluctant to initiate insulin.


2015 ◽  
Vol 235 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-96
Author(s):  
Jen-Chieh Lin ◽  
Mei-Shu Lai

Objective: To evaluate the association between the development of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) and antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) use among type 2 diabetic patients with concomitant hypertension. Methods: Type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-100 years who had at least one prescription for AHDs between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) 2005. The incidence rates of STDR were followed and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the risk associated with AHDs. Results: Users of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were associated with a significantly higher risk than users of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), independent of baseline characteristics. After adjusting for time-varying use of concomitant medications for propensity score-matched or -unmatched cohorts, the results showed that patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs and CCBs were associated with a significantly greater risk compared with β-blocker users. Conclusions: Our study did not support a superiority of ACEIs/ARBs and CCBs over β-blockers for lowering the progression of diabetic retinopathy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document