scholarly journals Why do challenges still exist in primary care for patients with spinal cord injury?

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-137
Author(s):  
Colleen McMillan ◽  
James Milligan ◽  
Loretta M. Hillier ◽  
Craig Bauman ◽  
Lindsay Donaldson ◽  
...  

Despite having high healthcare needs, individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) receive suboptimal primary care; they are less likely than able-bodied persons to receive preventive care and more likely to have unmet health care needs. The aim of this mixed quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (interviews) study was to gather primary care health provider and rehabilitation specialists’ perspectives on why these challenges persist despite the increasing body of evidence identifying delivery service gaps. Surveys were completed by 12 family physicians who referred individuals with SCI to an interprofessional primary care mobility clinic. Interviews were completed with eight SCI rehabilitation providers. Questions in both the survey and interviews were asked related to the barriers to the provision of optimal care for SCI, potential solutions, and preferred methods for knowledge dissemination. Skill and attitudinal reasons were offered for the lack of evidence to practice transfer including: the absence of patient self-management, poor access to specialists, lack of education for family practice physicians, fragmentation of community resources and co-ordination upon hospital discharge. Solutions offered included greater patient self-management, better access to specialists, specialized primary care services and provision of SCI guidelines and protocols. Participant explanations and solutions were then analyzed through a social disability lens to see if new understandings could be identified to explain the lack of uptake from research findings to clinical practice for this underserviced vulnerable population.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e044152
Author(s):  
Mokgadi Kholofelo Mashola ◽  
Elzette Korkie ◽  
Diphale Joyce Mothabeng

IntroductionApproximately 80% of people with spinal cord injury experience clinically significant chronic pain. Pain (whether musculoskeletal or neuropathic) is consistently rated as one of the most difficult problems to manage and negatively affects the individual’s physical, psychological and social functioning and increases the risk of pain medication misuse and poor mental health. The aim of this study is to therefore determine the presence of pain and its impact on functioning and disability as well as to develop a framework for self-management of pain for South African manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.Methods and analysisCommunity-dwelling participants with spinal cord injury will be invited to participate in this three-phase study. Phase 1 will use a quantitative, correlational design to determine factors related to pain such as pectoralis minor length, scapular dyskinesis, wheelchair functioning, physical quality of life, community reintegration and pain medication misuse. Demographic determinants of pain such as age, gender, type of occupation, completeness of injury and neurological level of injury will also be investigated. Participants with pain identified in phase 1 will be invited to partake in a qualitative descriptive and contextually designed phase 2 to explore their lived experience of pain through in-depth interviews. The results of phases 1 and 2 will then be used with the assistance from experts to develop a framework for self-management of pain using a modified Delphi study. Data analysis will include descriptive and inferential statistics (quantitative data) and thematic content analysis (qualitative data).Ethics and disseminationApproval for this study is granted by the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Pretoria (approval number 125/2018). This study is registered with the South African National Health Research Database (reference GP201806005). This study’s findings will be shared in academic conferences and published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512515334p1
Author(s):  
W. Ben Mortenson ◽  
Gurkaran Singh ◽  
Ethan Simpson ◽  
Megan McGillivray ◽  
Jared Adams ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karon F. Cook ◽  
Michael A. Kallen ◽  
Charles Bombardier ◽  
Alyssa M. Bamer ◽  
Seung W. Choi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1136-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Hirsche ◽  
Beverly Williams ◽  
Allyson Jones ◽  
Patricia Manns

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. P. Munce ◽  
Timothy C. Guetterman ◽  
Susan B. Jaglal

In the exploratory sequential design, the qualitative phase occurs first and is followed by the quantitative phase. The methodological purpose of this article is to demonstrate how an exploratory sequential approach, including the use of a joint display, can be used for complex intervention development. This article presents and integrates the qualitative and quantitative findings from a series of previously published studies on the considerations for a tailored self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury. This article serves as a reference for other researchers, clinicians, and/or other stakeholders on using the exploratory sequential design for complex intervention development. The exploratory sequential design should be used more broadly for the development of relevant and sustainable interventions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary H. Wilde ◽  
James M. McMahon ◽  
Eileen Fairbanks ◽  
Judith Brasch ◽  
Robert Parshall ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan R. Molton ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
Warren Nielson ◽  
Diana Cardenas ◽  
Dawn M. Ehde

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document