scholarly journals Microphthalmic Mutant Mouse Eye Lens Obsolescence(Elo).

Author(s):  
Shigeo MASAKI ◽  
Tomomasa WATANABE
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Camillo Peracchia ◽  
Stephen J. Girsch

The fiber cells of eye lens communicate directly with each other by exchanging ions, dyes and metabolites. In most tissues this type of communication (cell coupling) is mediated by gap junctions. In the lens, the fiber cells are extensively interconnected by junctions. However, lens junctions, although morphologically similar to gap junctions, differ from them in a number of structural, biochemical and immunological features. Like gap junctions, lens junctions are regions of close cell-to-cell apposition. Unlike gap junctions, however, the extracellular gap is apparently absent in lens junctions, such that their thickness is approximately 2 nm smaller than that of typical gap junctions (Fig. 1,c). In freeze-fracture replicas, the particles of control lens junctions are more loosely packed than those of typical gap junctions (Fig. 1,a) and crystallize, when exposed to uncoupling agents such as Ca++, or H+, into pseudo-hexagonal, rhombic (Fig. 1,b) and orthogonal arrays with a particle-to-particle spacing of 6.5 nm. Because of these differences, questions have been raised about the interpretation of the lens junctions as communicating junctions, in spite of the fact that they are the only junctions interlinking lens fiber cells.


Author(s):  
E.L. Benedetti ◽  
I. Dunia ◽  
Do Ngoc Lien ◽  
O. Vallon ◽  
D. Louvard ◽  
...  

In the eye lens emerging molecular and structural patterns apparently cohabit with the remnants of the past. The lens in a rather puzzling fashion sums up its own natural history and even transient steps of the differentiation are memorized. A prototype of this situation is well outlined by the study of the lenticular intercellular junctions. These membrane domains exhibit structural, biochemical and perhaps functional polymorphism reflecting throughout life the multiple steps of the differentiation of the epithelium into fibers and of the ageing process of the lenticular cells.The most striking biochemical difference between the membrane derived from the epithelium and from the fibers respectively, concerns the presence of the 26,000 molecular weight polypeptide (MP26) in the latter membranes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 657 ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
JL Vecchio ◽  
JL Ostroff ◽  
EB Peebles

An understanding of lifetime trophic changes and ontogenetic habitat shifts is essential to the preservation of marine fish species. We used carbon and nitrogen stable isotope values (δ13C and δ15N) recorded within the laminar structure of fish eye lenses, reflecting both diet and location over time, to compare the lifetime trends of 2 demersal mesopredators. Tilefish Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps inhabit burrows on the outer continental shelf, which results in exceptional site fidelity. Red grouper Epinephelus morio are spawned on the middle to outer continental shelf, move to the inner shelf for the juvenile period, and return offshore upon sexual maturity. Both species inhabit the eastern Gulf of Mexico, a region with a distinctive offshore-inshore gradient in background δ13C values. Within individual tilefish (n = 36), sequences of δ13C values and δ15N values had strong, positive correlations with eye-lens diameter, and strong correlations between the 2 isotopes (mean Spearman r = 0.86), reflecting an increase in trophic position with growth and little lifetime movement. In red grouper (n = 30), δ15N values positively correlated with eye-lens diameter, but correlations between δ15N and δ13C were weak (mean Spearman r = 0.29), suggesting cross-shelf ontogenetic movements. Linear mixed model results indicated strong relationships between δ15N and δ13C values in tilefish eye lenses but no convergence in the red grouper model. Collectively, these results are consistent with previously established differences in the life histories of the 2 species, demonstrating the potential utility of eye-lens isotope records, particularly for investigating the life histories of lesser-known species.


2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Viteri ◽  
Ana Maria Edwards ◽  
Julio De la Fuente ◽  
Eduardo Silva
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 1013-1020
Author(s):  
Ken Kitamura ◽  
Yasuhiro Yoshikawa ◽  
Fumiko Ochikubo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document