Transforaminal Lumber Interbody Fusion in Management of Degenerative Lumber Disc Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seleem NA
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Kitsopoulos ◽  
Bernd Wiedenhoefer ◽  
Stefan Hemmer ◽  
Christoph Fleege ◽  
Mohammad Arabmotlagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Expandable Titanium Cage ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

Background: Compared with static cages, expandable cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), are thought to require less posterior bony removal and nerve root retraction. They may allow the creation of a greater lordotic angle and lordosis restoration. Objective: This study investigated whether TLIF using an expandable lordotic interbody cage facilitates an improvement in both segmental lordosis and the restoration of intradiscal height. Methods: A total of 32 patients with 40 operated segments underwent TLIF surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease and were consecutively included in this prospective observational study. Of those patients, 25 received monosegmental treatment, six were treated bisegmentally, and one was treated trisegmentally. All patients were assessed clinically and radiographically preoperatively, as well as one week, six months, and two years postoperatively. Results: Two patients required revision for screw loosening and pseudarthrosis. In four patients, the endplate was violated intraoperatively due to cage placement. Postoperatively, cage subsidence was observed in four patients. Significant improvement in the mean degree of spondylolisthesis was noted at the two-year mark. Mean segmental lordosis improved postoperatively. A significant increase in mean disc height of the treated segment was also found. Overall, with the exception of pain, no significant clinical or radiographic changes were reported between the first postoperative week and the two-year year follow-up mark. The mean pain, functional, and quality of life outcomes improved significantly from the preoperative to postoperative period, with no deterioration between six months and two years. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that favorable outcomes can be achieved by using an expandable titanium cage in TLIF procedures.

Systematic Review of Anterior Interbody Fusion Techniques for Single- and Double-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Spine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (14) ◽  
pp. E950-E960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilco Jacobs ◽  
Paul C. Willems ◽  
Moyo Kruyt ◽  
Jacques van Limbeek ◽  
Patricia G. Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Anterior Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Long-term outcome of fusion for degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1526-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Endler ◽  
Per Ekman ◽  
Ivan Berglund ◽  
Hans Möller ◽  
Paul Gerdhem
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Posterolateral Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

AimsChronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).Patients and MethodsA total of 2874 patients who were operated on at one or two lumbar levels were followed for a mean of 9.2 years (3.6 to 19.1) for any additional lumbar spine surgery. Patient-reported outcome data were available preoperatively (n = 2874) and at one year (n = 2274), two years (n = 1958), and a mean of 6.9 years (n = 1518) postoperatively and consisted of global assessment and visual analogue scales of leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol five-dimensional index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and satisfaction with treatment. Statistical analyses were performed with competing-risks proportional hazards regression or analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline variables.ResultsThe number of patients with additional surgery were 32/183 (17%) in the PLF group, 229/1256 (18%) in the IPLF group, and 439/1435 (31%) in the IBF group. With the PLF group as a reference, the hazard ratio for additional lumbar surgery was 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.72) for the IPLF group and 2.13 (95% CI 1.45 to 3.12) for the IBF group. All patient-reported outcomes improved after surgery (p < 0.001) but were without statistically significant differences between the groups at the one-, two- and 6.9-year follow-ups (all p ≥ 0.12).ConclusionThe addition of interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion was associated with a higher risk for additional surgery and showed no advantages in patient-reported outcome Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1526–1533

scholarly journals Minimally invasive L5–S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterior plate

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Andre M. Jakoi ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Scoliosis ◽  
Anterior Plate ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lumbar interbody fusion is an important technique for the treatment of degenerative disc disease and degenerative scoliosis. The oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) establishes a minimally invasive retroperitoneal exposure anterior to the psoas and lumbar plexus. In this video case presentation, the authors demonstrate the techniques of the OLIF at L5–S1 performed on a 69-year-old female with degenerative scoliosis as one component of an overall strategy for her deformity correction.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/VMUYWKLAl0g.

scholarly journals Safety of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures for Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822093802
Author(s):  
Kuan-Yu Chi ◽  
Shih-Hao Cheng ◽  
Yu-Kai Kuo ◽  
En-Yuan Lin ◽  
Yi-No Kang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Degenerative Disc

Study Design: A network meta-analysis. Objectives: Lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) is an important issue in aging population, for which lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a feasible management in cases refractory to conservative therapy. There are various techniques available to perform LIF, including posterior (PLIF), transforaminal (TLIF), and anterior (ALIF) approaches. However, the comparative safety profile of these procedures remains controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate comparative adverse events of the LIF procedures in patients with LDDD. Methods: We searched 5 databases for relevant prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. After quality assessments, we extracted neural, spinal, vascular, and wound events for conducting contrast-based network meta-analysis. Results were reported in risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). Results: We identified 14 studies involving 921 participants with LDDD. Pooled result showed that open PLIF (OPLIF) leads to significantly higher overall adverse event rate than does open TLIF (OTLIF; RR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.21-9.73). OTLIF confers the highest SUCRA in neural (78.7) and spinal (80.8) event rates. Minimally invasive TLIF has the highest SUCRA in vascular event (84.2), and minimally invasive PLIF has the highest SUCRA in wound event (88.1). No inconsistency or publication bias was detected in the results. Conclusions: Based on our results, perhaps OPLIF should be avoided in the management of LDDD due to the inferiority of overall complications. Specifically, TLIF seems to have the safest profile in terms of neural, spinal, and vascular events. Nevertheless, shared decision making is still mandatory when choosing the proper LIF procedure for patients with LDDD in clinical practice.

Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crispin Wigfield ◽  
Steven Gill ◽  
Richard Nelson ◽  
Ilana Langdon ◽  
Newton Metcalf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Autologous Bone Graft ◽  
Intervertebral Discs ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors report the preservation of motion at surgically treated and adjacent spinal segments after placing an artificial cervical joint (ACJ) and they describe the influence of interbody fusion on changes in angulation occurring in the sagittal plane at adjacent levels in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Methods. The authors conducted a prospective nonrandomized study of patients in whom an ACJ was placed or autologous bone graft interbody fusion was performed. Angular measurements at levels adjacent to that surgically treated were calculated using plain flexion—extension radiographs obtained at 6-month intervals. Analyses of qualitative data, such as increase or decrease in adjacent-level motion, and the degree of disc degeneration were performed. Quantitative data were also analyzed. In the fusion group a significant increase in adjacent-level movement was demonstrated at the 12-month follow-up visit compared with the group of patients in whom ACJs were placed (p < 0.001). The increase in movement occurred predominantly at intervertebral discs that were preoperatively regarded as normal (p < 0.02). An overall reduction in adjacent-level movement was observed in patients who underwent joint replacement, although this was compensated for by the movement provided by the ACJ itself. Conclusions. Fusion results in increased motion at adjacent levels. The increase in adjacent-level motion derives from those discs that appear radiologically normal prior to surgery. It remains unknown whether ACJs have a protective influence on adjacent intervertebral discs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document