Congenital Hand Anomalies

2020 ◽  
pp. 139-152
Author(s):  
Michael L. Bentz
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Mukund Thatte ◽  
Nayana Nayak
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692090398
Author(s):  
N. N. Nietosvaara ◽  
A. J. Sommarhem ◽  
J. M. Puhakka ◽  
R. E. S. Tan ◽  
J. Schalamon ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Impact of appearance of congenital hand anomalies has not previously been reported. The purpose of this study was to describe the common perception about how different congenitally malformed hands look. Material and Methods: We developed a questionnaire in a game format to evaluate the appearance of different hands. Altogether 1450 (954 females) 4- to 84-year-old residents (296 children) of two European and one Asian (n = 102) country were asked to rate the appearance of different looking hands on a five-point pictorial Likert-type scale. Standardized photographs of the dorsal aspect of 17 different congenitally malformed non-operated hands and a normal hand were presented to respondents. Significance of age, gender, nationality, and profession of the respondents was assessed. Results: The respondents’ ranking order of the hands was nearly consistent. The normal hand (mean = 4.43, standard deviation = 0.85, Md = 5) and clinodactyly (mean = 4.37, standard deviation = 0.86, Md = 5) were perceived to have the best appearance. Symbrachydactyly (mean = 1.42, standard deviation = 0.68, Md = 1) and radial club hand (mean = 1.40, standard deviation = 0.68, Md = 1) received the lowest scores. Adults rated the appearance of hands higher than children regarding 14 hands, females higher than men regarding 15 hands, and Europeans higher than Asians in 4 hands (p < 0.05, respectively). Europeans rated four-finger hand (mean = 3.21, standard deviation = 1.18, Md = 3) better looking than six-finger hand (mean = 2.92, standard deviation = 1.18, Md = 3, p < 0.005), whereas Asians gave higher scores to six-finger hand (mean = 2.66, standard deviation = 1.26, Md = 3) compared to four-finger hand (mean = 2.51, standard deviation = 1.14, Md = 2). Medical doctors and nurses gave higher scores compared to the other profession groups, school children, and high school students in five hands (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A normal hand is perceived distinctly better looking than most congenitally different hands. Different malformations’ appearance was ranked very coherently in the same order despite of participants’ age, gender, nationality, or profession. Asians seem to prefer an additional digit to a four-finger hand.


The Lancet ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 326 (8452) ◽  
pp. 443 ◽  
Author(s):  
JohnM. Graham ◽  
ForstE. Brown ◽  
RichardL. Saunders ◽  
AllenJ. Hinkle ◽  
JudithE. Frank ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209
Author(s):  
Gillian D Smith
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth S. Baynam ◽  
Claudette Gonzalez ◽  
Samia A. Temtamy
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (05) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmela R. Massimino ◽  
Pierluigi Smilari ◽  
Filippo Greco ◽  
Silvia Marino ◽  
Davide Vecchio ◽  
...  

AbstractPoland's syndrome (PS; OMIM 173800) is a rare congenital syndrome which consists of absence or hypoplasia of the pectoralis muscle. Other features can be variably associated, including rib defects. On the affected side other features (such as of breast and nipple anomalies, lack of subcutaneous tissue and skin annexes, hand anomalies, visceral, and vertebral malformation) have been variably documented. To date, association of PS with central nervous system malformation has been rarely reported remaining poorly understood and characterized. We report a left-sided PS patient carrying a de novo 1.5 Mb Xp22.31 duplication diagnosed in addiction to strabismus, optic nerves and chiasm hypoplasia, corpus callosum abnormalities, ectopic neurohypophysis, pyelic ectasia, and neurodevelopmental delay. Since, to our knowledge, this features' association has not been previously reported, we argue that this case may contribute to further widening of the variability of PS phenotype.


2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
İbrahim İlker Çetin ◽  
Dilek Aktaş ◽  
Ergül Tunçbilek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document