JAUNDICE, NEWBORN (BABY, EARLY)

Keyword(s):  
The Lancet ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 238 (6172) ◽  
pp. 737
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. F137-F137 ◽  
Author(s):  
S T Dharmaraj ◽  
N D Embleton ◽  
A Jenkins ◽  
G Jones

Midwifery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Rogers ◽  
Linda Bloomfield ◽  
Joy Townsend

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1948 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDITH B. JACKSON ◽  
RICHARD W. OLMSTED ◽  
ALAN FOORD ◽  
HERBERT THOMS ◽  
KATE HYDER

introduction Rooming-in is the term currently in use to designate the hospital arrangement whereby a mother may have her newborn baby in a crib by her bedside whenever she wishes. The term was first used by Gesell and Ilg.1 Such an arrangement was established for study purposes on the University Service of the Grace-New Haven Community Hospital in October 1946. The four-bed ward used for this purpose is known as the Rooming-In Unit. An account of development of this Unit with a few preliminary observations is the subject of this paper. Because of the enthusiastic participation of fathers in the project from the day of its inception, the authors were inclined to entitle the paper,“Rooming-In for Parents and Newborns.” The husband may be with his wife throughout the first stage of labor if mutually agreeable; under normal circumstances he may see his baby shortly after birth—even hold him; he may continue to get closely acquainted with his child day after day in the hospital, and watch his wife and the baby at nursing time if that happens to occur during visiting hours. This paternal participation has afforded obvious satisfaction to both parents which we believe is salutary for the baby. Indeed, the first major assumption in making plans for the Rooming-In Unit has been that a mother's satisfaction with herself and with the attention and care bestowed upon her (by husband, parents, members of medical and nursing staff)is the best guarantee for her inclination and ability to satisfy


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-237
Author(s):  
T. E. C.

John Locke (1632-1704), physician and philosopher, is best known for his Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). His reputation as a philosopher has overshadowed the extent of his medical interests. Locke's journals between 1678 and 1698 contain thousands of items of medical interest. An entry in his journal for September 1684 contained the following recommendations for the care of the newborn infant.1 1. Soon after birth the baby can be given 1 or 2 spoonfuls of syrup of violets with almond oil, to loosen the bowels and keep it from convulsive colic. Or else distilled olive oil can be mixed with sugar. 2. If the newborn baby is in a weak condition you can blow on it the smell of chewed onions and cloves; smear its nostrils and lips with Cinnamon water; press warm slices of meat on its head and anus; wrap in bandages soaked in red wine and place in a bath composed of water or beer and fresh butter. If the baby is lively give a little after a mixture of 1 spoonful of distilled almond oil and syrup of Cowslip flowers and ½ spoonful of wine tempered with sugar, so that it can purge itself properly. 3. As soon as it begins to feed on pap, give it for the first few days a little powder of Marchion. 4. If it is weak apply to the region of the heart a cloth coaked with warm Embryon. The best ways to stimulate its strength are baths, putting warm wine on its head, placing hot meat on its chest, smearing its nose and lips with cinnamon water, putting onions near its nostrils, etc.


1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 323-324

Any practitioner who has struggled for years with the dilemma of the jaundiced newborn baby will welcome the practice parameter on hyperbilirubinemia prepared by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).1 Similarly, Gartner's review article on neonatal jaundice, which incorporates the recommendations of the practice parameter, should bring even more joy to the clinician seeking practical guidance.2 Is it too good to be true? Just when an area of clinical confusion appears to be clarified by not one but two guidelines, confusion returns in the form of discrepancies between the two articles. As some alert readers have pointed out, Gartner's main table (Table 1) contains several numbers that differ from those in the corresponding table of the practice parameter (Table 2).


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Ghulam Mostafa Khan

Proper selection of donor’s blood group is essential to prevent transfusion hazards. It is known that ABO antigen is fully developed at birth but the newborn baby does not produce ABO antibodies until 3 to 6 months of age. The ABO antibodies present in the serum of newborn babies are derived from mother’s blood due to placental transfer. So the blood group of the newborn baby is done by ABO antigen grouping (forward grouping) only, antibody grouping (reverse grouping) is not required. In case of transfusion of blood in newborn under 4 months of age, cross-matching of donor’s blood is done with the mother’s blood if it is available. We know, recipient’s same group of blood is always preferable in case of transfusion in adults or older children. But selection of blood for transfusion in the infants under 4 months of age depends on the mother’s blood group as well. If the mother’s blood group differs from the infant’s blood group, the infant’s same group of blood may not be selected for transfusion. For example, if the mother’s blood group is “O” and the newborn blood group is “A” or “B”, infant’s same group “A” or “B” group blood could not be transfused, because the anti-A & anti-B antibodies can be derived in the infant’s serum from mother’s blood which may react with the “A” or “B” antigen of the donor’s blood. In this case “O” group packed RBCs should be selected for transfusion. “O” group whole blood may contain IgG anti-A and anti-B antibodies in the plasma which can react with the “A” or “B” antigen of the infant’s blood. So to avoid anti-A & anti-B antibodies in “O” group, plasma should be discarded and the packed RBCs should be transfused. In case of Rh-negative mother with Rh positive baby, Rh antibody may develop in mother’s blood and Rh antibody may enter into baby’s circulation, in this case the infant should be transfused with Rh-negative blood to avoid Rh antigen & antibody reaction. So for the selection of blood for transfusion in newborn baby up to the age of 4 months mother’s blood group is important to select the appropriate blood. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v1i1.11138J Enam Med Col 2011; 1(1): 36-40


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document