Congenital Heart Defects and Receipt of Special Education Services

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. X10-X10
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services

Abstract 15517: Receipt of Special Education Services Among Children with Congenital Heart Defects in Atlanta, Georgia

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Colarusso ◽  
Autry Andrew ◽  
Hilda Razzaghi ◽  
Coleen Boyle ◽  
William Mahle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Prevalence Ratios

BACKGROUND: Population-based information on special education service needs among children with congenital heart defects (CHDs) is limited. We investigated the prevalence of receipt of special education services among children with CHDs. METHODS: Children born from 1982-2004 in metropolitan Atlanta with CHDs (n=3,744) were identified from a population-based birth defect surveillance program, and contemporaneous children born without major birth defects (n=860,715) were identified from birth certificates. Cohorts were linked to special education files for 1992-2012 school years to identify receipt of special education services. Children with CHDs and non-cardiac defects or genetic syndromes were excluded; children with isolated CHDs were classified by presence or absence of critical CHDs (i.e., defects needing intervention in the first year of life). We evaluated prevalence of special education services and calculated prevalence ratios (PRs) using children without birth defects as reference. RESULTS: Children with CHDs were 50% more likely than those without birth defects to use special education services (PR 1.5; 95% Confidence interval 1.4-1.7). Similar to children without birth defects, the most common eligibility among children with CHDs was speech/language impairment. Compared to children without birth defects, the prevalence of several special education eligibilities were significantly higher among children with all CHDs: any intellectual disability (PR 3.8), sensory impairment (PR 3.0), other health impairment (PR 2.8), significant developmental delay (PR 1.9), orthopedic impairment (PR 1.9), and specific learning disability (PR 1.4). For most special education eligibilities, there was no significant variation in the elevated prevalence ratios by presence or absence of critical CHDs. CONCLUSIONS: Children with many types of CHDs received special education services more often than children without birth defects. These findings highlight important resource needs for children with CHDs. Furthermore, they suggest that recommendations to perform developmental screening only on children with select CHDs may miss or delay identification of children with other CHDs, who may also need special education services.

scholarly journals Congenital Heart Defects and Receipt of Special Education Services

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Riehle-Colarusso ◽  
A. Autry ◽  
H. Razzaghi ◽  
C. A. Boyle ◽  
W. T. Mahle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Services

Minimally invasive partial inferior sternotomy for congenital heart defects in children

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Seipelt ◽  
T Tirilomis ◽  
T Paul ◽  
H Dörge ◽  
F Schoendube ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects

Surgical management of congenital heart defects in adolescent and adult patients, between years 2001–2008

2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (37) ◽  
pp. 1739-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
István Hartyánszky ◽  
Andrea Székely ◽  
László Király ◽  
Zsolt Prodán ◽  
Sándor Mihályi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Adult Patients

A felnőttkorban operált veleszületett szívhibák között vezetnek az I. rekonstrukciós beavatkozások: a) frissen felismert betegségek, b) megelőzően inoperábilisnak ítélt kórképek, c) pulmonalis hypertonia, jobbkamra-elégtelenség miatt „elkésett” műtétek. Növekszik a II. REDO műtétek száma: a) residuumok korrigálása, b) kinőtt, diszfunkciós homograftok cseréje, c) műtéti/intervenciós korrigálás utáni recoarctatio (aneurysma, dissectio) sebészete, d) aorta valvulotomia/valvuloplastica, illetve társvitiumok (TGA) korrigálásának következményeként Ross-műtét, műbillentyű-beültetés . Betegek, eredmények: A 2001–2008 között végzett 4496 műtét közül 166 volt fiatal-felnőtt korú (16–52, átlagéletkor: 28 év) (Ia: 77, Ib: 15, Ic: 4, IIa: 11, IIb: 22, IIc: 9, IId: 28). Műtéti mortalitás nem volt, 1 beteg pulmonalis hypertoniás krízisben, 1 jobbkamra-elégtelenség miatti malignus ritmuszavarban, 2 többszerv-elégtelenségben halt meg. Konklúzió: A rizikófaktorokat a pulmonalis hypertonia és a jobbkamra-elégtelenség jelenti. A bonyolult sebészi megoldások a „congenitalis szívsebész” számára nem jelentenek problémát, de koraibb diagnózisok, terápiában az extracorporalis membránoxigenátor használata az eredményeket javíthatja.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document