Treatment of Tall Girls With Estrogen

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1195
Author(s):  
John D. Crawford

The practice of giving estrogen to normal girls destined to become taller than they wish goes back to the 1940s. The train of thought leading up to the first trials includes two basic observations. First, it was noted that children in whom persistent precocity syndromes develop early in life become short adults and have premature epiphyseal closure. Second, and conversely, in the absence of the gonadal steroids, the epiphyses remain open indefinitely and growth continues beyond the usual age of cessation. While the majority of these cases are complicated by the presence of pituitary disease and the fact that because of their lack of growth hormone the patients are small, the early clinicians bolstered their faith in the converse by their admiration of the enormous size reputed to be attained by the harem eunuchs. These observations prompted two conclusions. First, gonadal steroids were not only responsible for closing the epiphyses but also for "turning off" secretion of growth hormone. Thus, in the early 1930s, it was reasoned that while children would be well endowed, adults must lack any circulating pituitary growth hormone, save in the rare instance of acromegaly. These were the concepts that led to the treatment of that disorder first with gonadal extracts,1,2 then, when pure steroids became available, with androgens and estrogens.3 The effect of testosterone was disappointing; the beneficial influence of estrogen, however, was so impressive as to be taken as proof of the earlier drawn conclusion that it is the gonadal steroids that normally turn off growth hormone secretion at adolescence.

1990 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALBERT BECKERS ◽  
ACHILLE STEVENAERT ◽  
JEAN-MICHEL FOIDART ◽  
GEORGES HENNEN ◽  
FRANCIS FRANKENNE

Life Sciences ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 42 (23) ◽  
pp. 2315-2321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Ács ◽  
B. Kacsóh ◽  
Z. Veress ◽  
B.E. Tóth

1992 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Aguilar ◽  
M Tena-Sempere ◽  
L Pinilla

The effect of different androgens and estradiol on pituitary responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone was studied in intact and orchidectomized adult male Wistar rats, by injecting subcutaneously immediately after orchidectomy for two weeks with testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, 5-α androstane, 3-α, 17 β-diol or estradiol dissolved in olive oil (in doses of 0.2 or 2.0 mg·kg−1·day−1) or vehicle. Pituitary responsiveness was tested in pentobarbital anaesthetized rats by measuring growth hormone plasma levels at different times after administration of growth hormone releasing hormone (1-29) NH2. We found that: (a) High doses of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and 5-α androstane, 3α, 1 7 β-diol restored gonadotropin plasma concentrations and organ weights altered by orchidectomy; (b) both pituitary growth hormone content and concentration remained unaffected after orchidectomy or androgen replacement and decreased significantly after estradiol injection; (c) orchidectomy significantly reduced growth hormone-stimulated growth hormone releasing hormone secretion; (d) treatment with 5-α androstane, 3-α, 1 7 β-diol increased more than testosterone or dihydrotestosterone both the peak concentration and the mean growth hormone secretion after growth hormone releasing hormone stimulation: (e) no differences were observed in the treatment with testosterone or dihydrotestosterone; (f) estradiol given at a dose of 0.2 mg·kg−1·day−1 increased pituitary responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone. These results demonstrated that testosterone and 5-α androstane, 3-α, 17 β-diol, which do not differ in their action on pituitary growth hormone content, increased the pituitary responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone differently and that the low pituitary responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone previously described in prepubertal animals was not due mainly to the secretion of 5-α androstane, 3-α, 1 7 β-diol.


1980 ◽  
Vol 63 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 235-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Tapia-Arancibia ◽  
Sandor Arancibia ◽  
Marie-Thérèse Bluet-Pajot ◽  
Alain Enjalbert ◽  
Jacques Epelbaum ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document