A case study on a college writing course : A critical biography

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 289-336
Author(s):  
Jooyoung Lee
Keyword(s):  
College Writing ◽  
Writing Course

How Students in a First-Year Composition Course Respond to the Flipped Classroom

2016 ◽  
pp. 1405-1425
Author(s):  
Christina R. Grimsley
Keyword(s):  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
College Writing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Video Technology ◽  
Traditional Lecture ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
First Year Composition ◽  
Composition Course ◽  
Writing Course

This qualitative pilot study investigated how 19 students enrolled in an entry-level college writing course responded to the use of video technology to supplement and flip class curriculum. Students were provided 10 video podcasts to augment course content and flip four class lessons. Collected through six student surveys and video download data, the results, including students' podcast viewership behaviors and attitudes toward the videos, are presented. The data revealed the college writing students involved in this study were generally satisfied with the flipped classroom and preferred it over the traditional lecture format. Download patterns indicated, however, less than half of the students watched the podcasts. Despite low viewership, the results suggest that the incorporation of video technology brings writing teachers opportunities to optimize class time by delving deeper into course content and by expanding the number of course assignments.

Developing a Writing Course for State Employees: A Case Study

1982 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Rothwell
Keyword(s):  
Federal Agency ◽  
Course Development ◽  
Writing Program ◽  
Writing Course ◽  
The Future ◽  
State Employees

Government writing has often been called gobbledygook—vague, windy, and pretentious prose thrust on unwilling readers [1]. Nowhere, it seems would a writing course hold such rich promise as in a state or a federal agency. While many of these programs have been conducted [2], there is little in print on designing them or on dealing with the management or course development problems unique to them.1 This case study will document the effort to design and conduct such an in-house writing program. It will provide resource materials and strategies for those who, in the future, will be faced with developing and delivering such courses.

The Assessment of Technical Writing: A Case Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Elliot ◽  
Margaret Kilduff ◽  
Robert Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Educational Outcomes ◽  
Writing Assessment ◽  
Technical Writing ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Student Writing ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Writing Courses ◽  
Assessment Program ◽  
Writing Course

This article describes the design and evaluation of a formal writing assessment program within a technical writing course. Our purpose in this base-line study was to evaluate student writing at the conclusion of the course. In implementing this evaluation, we addressed fundamental issues of sound assessment: reliability and validity. Our program may encourage others seeking to assess educational outcomes in technical writing courses.

Evaluation in the course development process

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris Van de Poel ◽  
Jessica Gasiorek
Keyword(s):  
Development Process ◽  
First Year ◽  
Course Development ◽  
First Year Writing ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Course Materials ◽  
Writing Course ◽  
The University

Evaluation is a critical but frequently underutilized part of the (language) course development process. Instructors’ reasons for avoiding it vary, but often include the concern that conducting evaluations will draw time and attention away from course content. Using All Write, a first-year writing course at the University of Antwerp, as a case study, this article shows how mechanisms for feedback and evaluation can be incorporated into course materials with minimal impact, as well as demonstrates the benefits of evaluation as both a validation process and a guide for course revision. Moreover, it will show how the stakeholders, primarily learners, but also teachers, may be drawn into the process and potentially benefit from it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document