scholarly journals Data describing every diseased coral record from surveys in the Caribbean during 2012 (Contagious coral diseases project)

Author(s):  
Robert van Woesik
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Cróquer ◽  
Ernesto Weil ◽  
Caroline S. Rogers

For several decades, white plagues (WPDs: WPD-I, II and III) and more recently, stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) have significantly impacted Caribbean corals. These diseases are often difficult to separate in the field as they produce similar gross signs. Here we aimed to compare what we know about WPD and SCTLD in terms of: (1) pathology, (2) etiology, and (3) epizootiology. We reviewed over 114 peer-reviewed publications from 1973 to 2021. Overall, WPD and SCTLD resemble each other macroscopically, mainly due to the rapid tissue loss they produce in their hosts, however, SCTLD has a more concise case definition. Multiple-coalescent lesions are often observed in colonies with SCTLD and rarely in WPD. A unique diagnostic sign of SCTLD is the presence of bleached circular areas when SCTLD lesions are first appearing in the colony. The paucity of histopathologic archives for WPDs for multiple species across geographies makes it impossible to tell if WPD is the same as SCTLD. Both diseases alter the coral microbiome. WPD is controversially regarded as a bacterial infection and more recently a viral infection, whereas for SCTLD the etiology has not been identified, but the putative pathogen, likely to be a virus, has not been confirmed yet. Most striking differences between WPD and SCTLD have been related to duration and phases of epizootic events and mortality rates. While both diseases may become highly prevalent on reefs, SCTLD seems to be more persistent even throughout years. Both transmit directly (contact) and horizontally (waterborne), but organism-mediated transmission is only proven for WPD-II. Given the differences and similarities between these diseases, more detailed information is needed for a better comparison. Specifically, it is important to focus on: (1) tagging colonies to look at disease progression and tissue mortality rates, (2) tracking the fate of the epizootic event by looking at initial coral species affected, the features of lesions and how they spread over colonies and to a wider range of hosts, (3) persistence across years, and (4) repetitive sampling to look at changes in the microbiome as the disease progresses. Our review shows that WPDs and SCTLD are the major causes of coral tissue loss recorded in the Caribbean.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Putu Hernanda Krishna Ariszandy ◽  
I Dewa Nyoman Nurweda Putra ◽  
Widiastuti Widiastuti

Coral reef ecosystems play an important role in many aspects of human beings as one third of Indonesian population are living in coastal areas and depend their lives on this ecosystem. However, this ecosystem is threatened by various factors, one of them is coral disease. Increased sea water temperature, sedimentation, and pollutants can increase the growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause coral disease. The data of coral diseases was collected byqpurposive samplingpmethod which was chosen based on the presence of coral reefs and coastal conditions at each station in a belt transect of 20 x 2 m. Furthermore, coral diseases and coral species were identified based on identification books. The prevalence of coral disease was calculated by divided the total number of coral colonies with the total number of diseased coral then multiplied by 100%. Results showed that the highest coral disease prevalence were at site 3 and 4. Meanwhile, site 1 and 2 were lower than those sites. It was suggested that the coral disease prevalence is related to the domestic input from the coastal. As site 1 and 2 were relatively low populated than site 3 and 4.


2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1689) ◽  
pp. 20150205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn P. Sutherland ◽  
Brett Berry ◽  
Andrew Park ◽  
Dustin W. Kemp ◽  
Keri M. Kemp ◽  
...  

We propose ‘the moving target hypothesis’ to describe the aetiology of a contemporary coral disease that differs from that of its historical disease state. Hitting the target with coral disease aetiology is a complex pursuit that requires understanding of host and environment, and may lack a single pathogen solution. White pox disease (WPX) affects the Caribbean coral Acropora palmata . Acroporid serratiosis is a form of WPX for which the bacterial pathogen ( Serratia marcescens ) has been established. We used long-term (1994–2014) photographic monitoring to evaluate historical and contemporary epizootiology and aetiology of WPX affecting A. palmata at eight reefs in the Florida Keys. Ranges of WPX prevalence over time (0–71.4%) were comparable for the duration of the 20-year study. Whole colony mortality and disease severity were high in historical (1994–2004), and low in contemporary (2008–2014), outbreaks of WPX. Acroporid serratiosis was diagnosed for some historical (1999, 2003) and contemporary (2012, 2013) outbreaks, but this form of WPX was not confirmed for all WPX cases. Our results serve as a context for considering aetiology as a moving target for WPX and other coral diseases for which pathogens are established and/or candidate pathogens are identified. Coral aetiology investigations completed to date suggest that changes in pathogen, host and/or environment alter the disease state and complicate diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document